LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:28:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4913A7B2.9000609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081106170023.d5349c42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I do not understand this description "Get probed module even if the
> caller is in the kernel core code".
>
> What bug is being fixed here? What is the kernel behaviour before and
> after the patch?
When someone called register_*probe() from kernel-core code(not from
module) and that probes a kernel module, users can remove the probed
module because kprobe doesn't increment reference counter of the module.
(on the other hand, if the kernel-module calls register_*probe,
kprobe increments refcount of the probed module.)
Currently, we have no register_*probe() calling from kernel-core(except
smoke-test, but the smoke-test doesn't probe module), so there is no
real bugs. But the logic is wrong(or not fair) and it can causes a
problem when someone might want to probe module from kernel.
After this patch is applied, even if someone put register_*probe() call
in the kernel-core code, it increments the reference counter of the
probed module, and it prevents user to remove the module until stopping
probing it.
> Was the bug present in 2.6.27, 2.6.26 etc? Or was it a post-2.6.28
> regression?
Hmm, it might be an enhancement, because currently the kernel doesn't
have real bugs.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 5:56 [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-04 14:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-05 0:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 1:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 1:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 19:30 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 21:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 22:46 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 23:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-06 0:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 2:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-11-07 2:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 4:46 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-06 1:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-06 15:37 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 0:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4913A7B2.9000609@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).