From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755909Ab1AaSZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:25:39 -0500 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:48854 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754573Ab1AaSZi (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:25:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4D46FE9E.3010502@goop.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:25:34 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 References: <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110131170506.GA11939@dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20110131170506.GA11939@dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/31/2011 09:05 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:41:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20110121: >> >> New tree: unicore32 >> >> Renamed tree: swiotlb-xen to xen-two > Sweet. Thank you. >> Dropped tree: xen > Uh, why? Jeremy's tree should be OK now? Did something not > compile correctly? No, keep it dropped for now. I'll do a proper linux-next branch shortly. J