LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:15:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49BB59.8000303@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101311514580.7277@kaball-desktop>
On 01/31/2011 07:18 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
>
> In init_memory_mapping we are destroying all the mappings between
> _brk_end and _end, no matter if some memory areas in that range have
> been reserved using memblock_x86_reserve_range.
What's reserving things in that range? How do they get addresses
there? I would have thought they should all be brk-allocated?
> Besides if _end is not pmd aligned we might destroy the
> mappings for valid memory between _end and the following pmd.
Yes, that could be messy.
J
> In order to avoid this problem, before clearing any pmds we check if the
> corresponding memory area has been reserved and we only destroy the
> mapping if it hasn't.
>
> We found this problem because under Xen we have a valid mapping at _end,
> and if _end is not pmd aligned the current code destroys the initial
> part of it.
>
> In practice this fix does not have any impact on native.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 947f42a..66637bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
> if (!after_bootmem && !start) {
> pud_t *pud;
> pmd_t *pmd;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + u64 size, memblock_addr;
>
> mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4();
>
> @@ -291,11 +293,18 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
> * located on different 2M pages. cleanup_highmap(), however,
> * can only consider _end when it runs, so destroy any
> * mappings beyond _brk_end here.
> + * Respect memblock reserved regions.
> */
> pud = pud_offset(pgd_offset_k(_brk_end), _brk_end);
> pmd = pmd_offset(pud, _brk_end - 1);
> - while (++pmd <= pmd_offset(pud, (unsigned long)_end - 1))
> - pmd_clear(pmd);
> + addr = (_brk_end + PMD_SIZE - 1) & PMD_MASK;
> + while (++pmd <= pmd_offset(pud, (unsigned long)_end - 1)) {
> + memblock_addr = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(__pa(addr),
> + &size, PMD_SIZE);
> + if (memblock_addr == (u64) __pa(addr) && size >= PMD_SIZE)
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + addr += PMD_SIZE;
> + }
> }
> #endif
> __flush_tlb_all();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 15:18 Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-02 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-02-03 5:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 11:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-03 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-04 11:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-05 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-06 7:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06 7:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-06 17:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06 19:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 18:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 18:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 19:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 21:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 3:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 4:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 5:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 19:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 20:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 19:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-10 23:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-10 23:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-11 0:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-11 0:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-14 17:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 17:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-14 18:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-16 17:36 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 5:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 16:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D49BB59.8000303@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).