LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:02:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4ADFAD.7060507@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102031114030.7277@kaball-desktop>

On 02/03/2011 03:25 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>
>> How on Earth would you end up with a reserved region *inside the BRK*?
> 
> I think in practice you cannot, but you can have reserved regions at
> _end, that is the main problem I am trying to solve.
> If we have a reserved region at _end and _end is not PMD aligned, then
> we have a problem.
> 
> I thought that checking for reserved regions before destroying the
> mapping would be a decent solution (because it wouldn't affect the
> normal case); so I ended up checking between _brk_end and _end too.
> 
> Other alternative solutions I thought about but that I discarded because
> they also affect the normal case are:
> 
> - never destroy mappings that could go over _end;
> - always PMD align _end.
> 
> If none of the above are acceptable, I welcome other suggestions :-)
> 

Sounds like the code does the right thing, but the description needs to
be improved.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 15:18 Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-02 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03  5:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 11:25   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-03 17:02     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-02-04 11:35       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-05  1:18         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-06  7:02           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06  7:30             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-06 17:49               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06 19:24               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:50                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 18:04                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 18:58                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 19:18                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 21:56                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  3:12                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08  4:56                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  5:09                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:55                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 19:24                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 20:26                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 19:34                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-10 23:48                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-10 23:57                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-11  0:35                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-11  0:54                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:26                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-14 17:55                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 17:58                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-14 18:09                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 20:02                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-16 17:36                                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08  5:16                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:03                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 16:04                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:02           ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4ADFAD.7060507@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).