LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:04:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D516978.9050309@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102081401390.7277@kaball-desktop>

On 02/08/2011 06:03 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>> On 02/05/2011 11:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/05/2011 11:02 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>> why not just move calling cleanup_highmap down?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> something like attached patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch looks very clean and looks on the surface of it like it is
>>>>>> removing some ugly ad hoc code, but (as always) it needs a description
>>>>>> about the problem it solves and why it is correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy and xen guys, can you please check if it works well with xen ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually this patch makes things worse on xen, because before
>>>> cleanup_highmap() wasn't called at all on xen (on purpose) and now it
>>>> is, fully destroying all the mappings we have at _end.
>>>>
>>>> Can we add a check on memblock reserved regions in cleanup_highmap()?
>>>
>>> In case you are wondering how Yinghai Lu's patch would look like with
>>> the added check, here it is:
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
>>> index 19ae14b..184f778 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>>
>>>  #define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
>>>
>>> +bool memblock_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
>>>  u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
>>>  void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
>>> index 975f709..28686b6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
>>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static inline int pgd_large(pgd_t pgd) { return 0; }
>>>  #define __swp_entry_to_pte(x)          ((pte_t) { .pte = (x).val })
>>>
>>>  extern int kern_addr_valid(unsigned long addr);
>>> -extern void cleanup_highmap(void);
>>> +extern void cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end);
>>>
>>>  #define HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA
>>>  #define HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> index 2d2673c..5655c22 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> @@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
>>>        /* Make NULL pointers segfault */
>>>        zap_identity_mappings();
>>>
>>> -       /* Cleanup the over mapped high alias */
>>> -       cleanup_highmap();
>>> -
>>>        max_pfn_mapped = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>
>>>        for (i = 0; i < NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS; i++) {
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>>> index d3cfe26..91afde6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>>> @@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ static void __init init_gbpages(void)
>>>  static inline void init_gbpages(void)
>>>  {
>>>  }
>>> +static void __init cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>>  static void __init reserve_brk(void)
>>> @@ -922,6 +925,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>>         */
>>>        reserve_brk();
>>>
>>> +       /* Cleanup the over mapped high alias after _brk_end*/
>>> +       cleanup_highmap(_brk_end);
>>> +
>>>        memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
>>>        memblock_x86_fill();
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>> index 947f42a..f13ff3a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>>> @@ -279,25 +279,6 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
>>>        load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>> -       if (!after_bootmem && !start) {
>>> -               pud_t *pud;
>>> -               pmd_t *pmd;
>>> -
>>> -               mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4();
>>> -
>>> -               /*
>>> -                * _brk_end cannot change anymore, but it and _end may be
>>> -                * located on different 2M pages. cleanup_highmap(), however,
>>> -                * can only consider _end when it runs, so destroy any
>>> -                * mappings beyond _brk_end here.
>>> -                */
>>> -               pud = pud_offset(pgd_offset_k(_brk_end), _brk_end);
>>> -               pmd = pmd_offset(pud, _brk_end - 1);
>>> -               while (++pmd <= pmd_offset(pud, (unsigned long)_end - 1))
>>> -                       pmd_clear(pmd);
>>> -       }
>>> -#endif
>>>        __flush_tlb_all();
>>>
>>>        if (!after_bootmem && e820_table_end > e820_table_start)
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>>> index 71a5929..028c49e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>>> @@ -297,18 +297,26 @@ void __init init_extra_mapping_uc(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size)
>>>  * rounded up to the 2MB boundary. This catches the invalid pmds as
>>>  * well, as they are located before _text:
>>>  */
>>> -void __init cleanup_highmap(void)
>>> +void __init cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end)
>>>  {
>>>        unsigned long vaddr = __START_KERNEL_map;
>>> -       unsigned long end = roundup((unsigned long)_end, PMD_SIZE) - 1;
>>>        pmd_t *pmd = level2_kernel_pgt;
>>>        pmd_t *last_pmd = pmd + PTRS_PER_PMD;
>>> +       u64 size, addrp;
>>> +       bool changed;
>>> +
>>> +       end = roundup(end, PMD_SIZE) - 1;
>>>
>>>        for (; pmd < last_pmd; pmd++, vaddr += PMD_SIZE) {
>>>                if (pmd_none(*pmd))
>>>                        continue;
>>> -               if (vaddr < (unsigned long) _text || vaddr > end)
>>> -                       set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(0));
>>> +               if (vaddr < (unsigned long) _text || vaddr > end) {
>>> +                       addrp = __pa(vaddr);
>>> +                       size = PMD_SIZE;
>>> +                       changed = memblock_check_reserved_size(&addrp, &size, PMD_SIZE);
>>> +                       if (!changed && size)
>>> +                               set_pmd(pmd, __pmd(0));
>>> +               }
>>
>> for native path, memblock_check_reserved_size() are called 256 times
>> without obvious reasons.
> 
> 
> what about this patch, does it look like a reasonable solution?
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
> index 19ae14b..184f778 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  
>  #define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
>  
> +bool memblock_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
>  u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
>  void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> index 975f709..28686b6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static inline int pgd_large(pgd_t pgd) { return 0; }
>  #define __swp_entry_to_pte(x)		((pte_t) { .pte = (x).val })
>  
>  extern int kern_addr_valid(unsigned long addr);
> -extern void cleanup_highmap(void);
> +extern void cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end);
>  
>  #define HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA
>  #define HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
> index 2d2673c..5655c22 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
> @@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
>  	/* Make NULL pointers segfault */
>  	zap_identity_mappings();
>  
> -	/* Cleanup the over mapped high alias */
> -	cleanup_highmap();
> -
>  	max_pfn_mapped = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS; i++) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index d3cfe26..91afde6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ static void __init init_gbpages(void)
>  static inline void init_gbpages(void)
>  {
>  }
> +static void __init cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end)
> +{
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static void __init reserve_brk(void)
> @@ -922,6 +925,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	 */
>  	reserve_brk();
>  
> +	/* Cleanup the over mapped high alias after _brk_end*/
> +	cleanup_highmap(_brk_end);
> +
>  	memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
>  	memblock_x86_fill();
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 947f42a..f13ff3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -279,25 +279,6 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
>  	load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -	if (!after_bootmem && !start) {
> -		pud_t *pud;
> -		pmd_t *pmd;
> -
> -		mmu_cr4_features = read_cr4();
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * _brk_end cannot change anymore, but it and _end may be
> -		 * located on different 2M pages. cleanup_highmap(), however,
> -		 * can only consider _end when it runs, so destroy any
> -		 * mappings beyond _brk_end here.
> -		 */
> -		pud = pud_offset(pgd_offset_k(_brk_end), _brk_end);
> -		pmd = pmd_offset(pud, _brk_end - 1);
> -		while (++pmd <= pmd_offset(pud, (unsigned long)_end - 1))
> -			pmd_clear(pmd);
> -	}
> -#endif
>  	__flush_tlb_all();
>  
>  	if (!after_bootmem && e820_table_end > e820_table_start)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 71a5929..90a64de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -297,12 +297,25 @@ void __init init_extra_mapping_uc(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size)
>   * rounded up to the 2MB boundary. This catches the invalid pmds as
>   * well, as they are located before _text:
>   */
> -void __init cleanup_highmap(void)
> +void __init cleanup_highmap(unsigned long end)
>  {
>  	unsigned long vaddr = __START_KERNEL_map;
> -	unsigned long end = roundup((unsigned long)_end, PMD_SIZE) - 1;
>  	pmd_t *pmd = level2_kernel_pgt;
>  	pmd_t *last_pmd = pmd + PTRS_PER_PMD;
> +	u64 size, addrp;
> +	bool changed;
> +
> +	end = roundup(end, PMD_SIZE) - 1;
> +
> +	/* check for reserved regions after end */
> +	addrp = __pa(end);
> +	size = (PTRS_PER_PMD * PMD_SIZE + vaddr) - end;
> +	changed = memblock_check_reserved_size(&addrp, &size, PMD_SIZE);
> +	if (changed || !size) {
> +		/* reserved regions found, avoid removing mappings after end */
> +		pud_t *pud = pud_offset(pgd_offset_k(end), end);
> +		last_pmd = pmd_offset(pud, end);
> +	}
>  
>  	for (; pmd < last_pmd; pmd++, vaddr += PMD_SIZE) {
>  		if (pmd_none(*pmd))

test case:
native path, bootloader have initrd overlap with [0,512M)...

We will not get highmap cleared.

Maybe we have to keep two steps method.

Yinghai

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 15:18 Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-02 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03  5:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 11:25   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-03 17:02     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-04 11:35       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-05  1:18         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-06  7:02           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06  7:30             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-06 17:49               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-06 19:24               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 16:50                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 18:04                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 18:58                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 19:18                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-07 21:56                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  3:12                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08  4:56                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08  5:09                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:55                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 19:24                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 20:26                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 19:34                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-10 23:48                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-10 23:57                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-11  0:35                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-11  0:54                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:26                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-14 17:55                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 17:58                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-14 18:09                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 20:02                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-16 17:36                                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-07 19:00                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08  5:16                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-08 14:03                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-08 16:04                         ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-02-07 16:02           ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D516978.9050309@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/init: respect memblock reserved regions when destroying mappings' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).