LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] dm: Do not open log and cow device read-write for read-only mappings
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5A6EF4.3030905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110215020351.GD5825@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
On 02/15/2011 03:03 AM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:15:06AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> Sounds sensible ... though it is not all that easy to assemble an
>> array as 'read-only'.... it is possible though.
>
> For dm, it is looking like this change will *require* an upgrade to
> userspace LVM tools: some people who just update their kernels without
> updating their LVM tools too may find booting their machine fails. We
> are still evaluating exactly which parts of LVM and which classes of
> users are affected and how best to deal with this, but I know from
> experience that changes where a kernel update requires an associated
> userspace update are never well-received and we would normally try to
> give plenty of lead time by updating the userspace tools and starting to
> get them into the distributions before imposing the kernel change.
This little change is really problematic.
Not only lvm userspace has problems here, also cryptsetup is broken
for read-only mappings.
Of course this it can be easily fixed, but it take some time until
the new userspace is propagated to distros.
Seems it changed userspace API here. For example, this is no longer
working now:
fd = open(device, O_RDWR | flags);
if (fd == -1 && errno == EROFS) {
*readonly = 1;
fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | flags);
}
Milan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-13 2:02 block device read-only handling regression in 2.6.38-rc4 (bisected) Milan Broz
2011-02-13 10:58 ` [PATCH] loop: clear read-only flag in loop_clr_fd Tao Ma
2011-02-13 14:11 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-13 15:05 ` Tao Ma
2011-02-13 16:44 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-14 10:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 11:47 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-14 13:14 ` [PATCH][RFC] dm: Do not open log and cow device read-write for read-only mappings Milan Broz
2011-02-14 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:23 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-14 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 23:15 ` NeilBrown
2011-02-15 2:03 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2011-02-15 12:17 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2011-02-15 12:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-02-15 15:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 15:46 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-02-15 15:50 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 16:05 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-15 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 16:36 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-15 16:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 16:56 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-02-16 8:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 16:58 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-16 8:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 15:16 ` [PATCH] Return EROFS if read-only detected on block device Milan Broz
2011-02-14 14:39 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] dm: Do not open log and cow device read-write for read-only mappings Alasdair G Kergon
2011-02-14 14:07 ` [PATCH] loop: clear read-only flag in loop_clr_fd Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5A6EF4.3030905@redhat.com \
--to=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tm@tao.ma \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).