LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: "Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
	"Pekka Paalanen" <ppaalanen@gmail.com>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Tian Tao" <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>,
	"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Melissa Wen" <mwen@igalia.com>,
	"Luben Tuikov" <luben.tuikov@amd.com>,
	"Andrey Grodzovsky" <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>,
	"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	"Jack Zhang" <Jack.Zhang1@amd.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/scheduler: Add fence deadline support
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:45:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51311182-b06e-7fcf-ec20-b9657d866bbc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGve2LN2Us56e15rZrec7xXHrBhGT9NuPaOiQeiWrACbLw@mail.gmail.com>

Am 21.09.21 um 18:35 schrieb Rob Clark:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:57 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 10:45 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 11:47:55AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>>>
>>>> As the finished fence is the one that is exposed to userspace, and
>>>> therefore the one that other operations, like atomic update, would
>>>> block on, we need to propagate the deadline from from the finished
>>>> fence to the actual hw fence.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Split into drm_sched_fence_set_parent() (ckoenig)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c  |  2 +-
>>>>   include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h             |  8 ++++++
>>>>   3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> index bcea035cf4c6..4fc41a71d1c7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> @@ -128,6 +128,30 @@ static void drm_sched_fence_release_finished(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>>        dma_fence_put(&fence->scheduled);
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> +static void drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished(struct dma_fence *f,
>>>> +                                               ktime_t deadline)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct drm_sched_fence *fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f);
>>>> +     unsigned long flags;
>>>> +
>>>> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&fence->lock, flags);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* If we already have an earlier deadline, keep it: */
>>>> +     if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags) &&
>>>> +         ktime_before(fence->deadline, deadline)) {
>>>> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags);
>>>> +             return;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     fence->deadline = deadline;
>>>> +     set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags);
>>>> +
>>>> +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags);
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (fence->parent)
>>>> +             dma_fence_set_deadline(fence->parent, deadline);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled = {
>>>>        .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name,
>>>>        .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name,
>>>> @@ -138,6 +162,7 @@ static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_finished = {
>>>>        .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name,
>>>>        .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name,
>>>>        .release = drm_sched_fence_release_finished,
>>>> +     .set_deadline = drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished,
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>>   struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>> @@ -152,6 +177,15 @@ struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>>   }
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence);
>>>>
>>>> +void drm_sched_fence_set_parent(struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence,
>>>> +                             struct dma_fence *fence)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     s_fence->parent = dma_fence_get(fence);
>>>> +     if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT,
>>>> +                  &s_fence->finished.flags))
>>> Don't you need the spinlock here too to avoid races? test_bit is very
>>> unordered, so guarantees nothing. Spinlock would need to be both around
>>> ->parent = and the test_bit.
>>>
>>> Entirely aside, but there's discussions going on to preallocate the hw
>>> fence somehow. If we do that we could make the deadline forwarding
>>> lockless here. Having a spinlock just to set the parent is a bit annoying
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Alternative is that you do this locklessly with barriers and a _lot_ of
>>> comments. Would be good to benchmark whether the overhead matters though
>>> first.
>> So, my thinking is that very few (well no) guarantees are made to the
>> fence implementor that their ->set_deadline() is not called multiple
>> times, from multiple threads, etc.  And no guarantee that a later
>> deadline is set after an earlier deadline has been set.  It is all up
>> to the set_deadline() implementation to deal with these cases.
>>
>> So that means we just need the appropriate barrier-fu to ensure
>> another thread calling drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished() sees
>> fence->parent set before the test_bit.  It could mean that the backend
>> implementation sees the same deadline set twice, but that is fine.
>>
> something like:

Of hand I think that this should work.

Or rather say I can't see anything wrong with that.

Christian.

>
> -----
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> index 4fc41a71d1c7..7f2af6d1777c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static void
> drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished(struct dma_fence *f,
>      ktime_t deadline)
>   {
>    struct drm_sched_fence *fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f);
> + struct dma_fence *parent;
>    unsigned long flags;
>
>    spin_lock_irqsave(&fence->lock, flags);
> @@ -148,8 +149,9 @@ static void
> drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished(struct dma_fence *f,
>
>    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags);
>
> - if (fence->parent)
> - dma_fence_set_deadline(fence->parent, deadline);
> + parent = smp_load_acquire(&fence->parent);
> + if (parent)
> + dma_fence_set_deadline(parent, deadline);
>   }
>
>   static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled = {
> @@ -180,7 +182,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence);
>   void drm_sched_fence_set_parent(struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence,
>    struct dma_fence *fence)
>   {
> - s_fence->parent = dma_fence_get(fence);
> + smp_store_release(&s_fence->parent, dma_fence_get(fence));
>    if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT,
>         &s_fence->finished.flags))
>    dma_fence_set_deadline(fence, s_fence->deadline);
> -----
>
> BR,
> -R


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-03 18:47 [PATCH v3 0/9] dma-fence: Deadline awareness Rob Clark
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness Rob Clark
2021-09-08 17:55   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] drm/vblank: Add helper to get next vblank time Rob Clark
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] drm/atomic-helper: Set fence deadline for vblank Rob Clark
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/scheduler: Add fence deadline support Rob Clark
2021-09-08 17:45   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-09  6:22     ` Christian König
2021-09-14 13:38       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-21 15:57     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-21 16:35       ` Rob Clark
2021-09-21 16:45         ` Christian König [this message]
2021-09-21 20:09   ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-09-21 20:47     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-22  2:18       ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-09-22  3:32         ` Rob Clark
2021-09-22 14:31           ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-09-22 15:01             ` Rob Clark
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] drm/msm: Add deadline based boost support Rob Clark
2021-09-08 17:48   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 17:57     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] dma-buf/fence-array: Add fence deadline support Rob Clark
2021-09-08 18:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-09  6:55     ` Christian König
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] dma-buf/fence-chain: " Rob Clark
2021-09-08 17:54   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 18:19     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-08 18:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-09  6:31         ` Christian König
2021-09-03 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] dma-buf/sync_file: Add SET_DEADLINE ioctl Rob Clark
2021-09-08 17:50   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 18:23     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-08 18:49       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-08 19:40         ` Rob Clark
2021-09-08 21:10           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-21 18:08             ` Rob Clark
2021-09-27  8:42   ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-09-27  8:53     ` Christian König
2021-09-27 14:36     ` Rob Clark
2021-09-28  7:57       ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-09-03 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] dma-buf/sw_sync: Add fence deadline support Rob Clark
2021-09-09 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] dma-fence: Deadline awareness Simon Ser
2021-09-09 16:35   ` Rob Clark
2021-09-09 16:42     ` Simon Ser
2021-09-09 17:08       ` Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51311182-b06e-7fcf-ec20-b9657d866bbc@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jack.Zhang1@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=mwen@igalia.com \
    --cc=ppaalanen@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/scheduler: Add fence deadline support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).