LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Kumar P, Mahesh" <mahesh.kumar.p@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:42:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C07190.3090403@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421790603-30097-2-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On 2015/1/21 5:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The change allows to use dev_printk() type of macros in the module functions.
The patch itself looks good to me, but not sure why do we need this
change, will we use dev_prink in the subsequent patches?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> index d66a4fe..d338222 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <asm/pmc_atom.h>
>
> struct pmc_dev {
> + struct device *dev;
> u32 base_addr;
> void __iomem *regmap;
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> @@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ static void pmc_dbgfs_unregister(struct pmc_dev *pmc)
> debugfs_remove_recursive(pmc->dbgfs_dir);
> }
>
> -static int pmc_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static int pmc_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmc)
> {
> struct dentry *dir, *f;
>
> @@ -263,21 +264,21 @@ static int pmc_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> f = debugfs_create_file("dev_state", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO,
> dir, pmc, &pmc_dev_state_ops);
> if (!f) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dev_state register failed\n");
> + dev_err(pmc->dev, "dev_state register failed\n");
> goto err;
> }
>
> f = debugfs_create_file("pss_state", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO,
> dir, pmc, &pmc_pss_state_ops);
> if (!f) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pss_state register failed\n");
> + dev_err(pmc->dev, "pss_state register failed\n");
> goto err;
> }
>
> f = debugfs_create_file("sleep_state", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO,
> dir, pmc, &pmc_sleep_tmr_ops);
> if (!f) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "sleep_state register failed\n");
> + dev_err(pmc->dev, "sleep_state register failed\n");
> goto err;
> }
>
> @@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ err:
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> #else
> -static int pmc_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static int pmc_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmc)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -315,10 +316,12 @@ static int pmc_setup_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + pmc->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> /* PMC hardware registers setup */
> pmc_hw_reg_setup(pmc);
>
> - ret = pmc_dbgfs_register(pmc, pdev);
> + ret = pmc_dbgfs_register(pmc);
> if (ret) {
> iounmap(pmc->regmap);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 21:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 3:42 ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2015-01-22 9:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: pmc_atom: print index of device in loop Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 3:45 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-01-22 9:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: pmc_atom: supply register mappings via pmc object Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PMC driver: Add Cherrytrail PMC interface Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 4:02 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-01-22 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-26 2:30 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-02-23 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-02 6:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-03 3:37 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-30 13:05 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2015-03-31 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C07190.3090403@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.kumar.p@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).