LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vyasevich@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Question on SCTP ABORT chunk is generated when the association_max_retrans is reached
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C23581.9060809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFXGft+fwo=8LJEG7h6uOpGciSo5f_dXjSx3sn67RZZp7jsYHw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 01/23/2015 11:25 AM, Sun Paul wrote:
...
> I would like to check the behave in LKSCTP.
>
> we are running DIAMETER message over SCTP, and we have set the
> parameter "net.sctp.association_max_retrans = 4" in the LinuxOS.
>
> We noticed that when remote peer have retry to send the same request
> for 4 times, the LKSCTP will initiate an ABORT chunk with reason
> "association exceeded its max_retrans count".
>
> We would like to know whether this is the correct behavior? is there
> any other option that we can alter in order to avoid the ABORT chunk
> being sent?
I don't recall the RFC saying to send an ABORT, but let me double
check in the mean time.
Hmm, untested, but could you try something like that?
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index fef2acd..5ce198d 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -584,7 +584,8 @@ static void sctp_cmd_assoc_failed(sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_EVENT_ULP,
SCTP_ULPEVENT(event));
- if (asoc->overall_error_count >= asoc->max_retrans) {
+ if (asoc->overall_error_count >= asoc->max_retrans &&
+ error != SCTP_ERROR_NO_ERROR) {
abort = sctp_make_violation_max_retrans(asoc, chunk);
if (abort)
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAFXGftKp3=OfjkCVBuR-zM3+uZ42Sk_9i2UjAHBNnbX=hQJwpA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-23 10:25 ` Sun Paul
2015-01-23 11:50 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-01-23 16:05 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-01-23 17:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-23 18:30 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-01-23 18:36 ` Michael Tuexen
2015-01-26 13:47 ` Fwd: " Neil Horman
2015-01-23 18:36 ` Michael Tuexen
2015-01-23 19:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-26 1:27 ` Sun Paul
2015-01-26 11:46 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-01-26 13:17 ` Sun Paul
2015-01-26 13:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-23 16:08 ` Fwd: " Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C23581.9060809@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulrbk@gmail.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: Fwd: Question on SCTP ABORT chunk is generated when the association_max_retrans is reached' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).