From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762536AbbA3OF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:05:58 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:38084 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752531AbbA3OFz (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:05:55 -0500 Message-ID: <54CB8FBD.6050701@ti.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:05:49 +0200 From: Roger Quadros User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] usb: extcon: Fix USB-Host cable name References: <1422274532-9488-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1422274532-9488-3-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: > Felipe & Chanwoo, > > On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >> >> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros >> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > > This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible. > > Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? > If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. > > This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony > will pick the rest. Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". cheers, -roger