From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S964827AbbBBJK1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 04:10:27 -0500
Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:36580 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753468AbbBBJKW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 04:10:22 -0500
Message-ID: <54CF3EE7.2050705@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:09:59 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
CC: <balbi@ti.com>, <tony@atomide.com>, <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        <george.cherian@ti.com>, <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] usb: extcon: Fix USB-Host cable name
References: <1422274532-9488-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1422274532-9488-3-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> <54CB8FBD.6050701@ti.com> <54CF0555.4080004@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <54CF0555.4080004@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Chanwoo,

On 02/02/15 07:04, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Felipe & Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not
>>>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name.
>>>>
>>>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree?
>>> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks.
>>>
>>> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony
>>> will pick the rest.
>>
>> Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with
>> "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST".
> 
> Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or USB-HOST)
> without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in extcon
> header file by using capital letter.

OK. In that case, this patch is not required.
I will resend patch 1 with cable name corrected to "USB-HOST".

cheers,
-roger