LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
oleg@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kvm,rcu: use RCU extended quiescent state when running KVM guest
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:09:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D3B1CF.1000301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150205175014.GG5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 02/05/2015 12:50 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:52:37AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 02/05/2015 11:44 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Am 05.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb riel@redhat.com:
>>>> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> The host kernel is not doing anything while the CPU is executing
>>>> a KVM guest VCPU, so it can be marked as being in an extended
>>>> quiescent state, identical to that used when running user space
>>>> code.
>>>>
>>>> The only exception to that rule is when the host handles an
>>>> interrupt, which is already handled by the irq code, which
>>>> calls rcu_irq_enter and rcu_irq_exit.
>>>>
>>>> The guest_enter and guest_exit functions already switch vtime
>>>> accounting independent of context tracking, so leave those calls
>>>> where they are, instead of moving them into the context tracking
>>>> code.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/context_tracking.h | 8 +++++++-
>>>> include/linux/context_tracking_state.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking.h b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
>>>> index bd9f000fc98d..a5d3bb44b897 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/context_tracking.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
>>>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline enum ctx_state exception_enter(void)
>>>> static inline void exception_exit(enum ctx_state prev_ctx)
>>>> {
>>>> if (context_tracking_is_enabled()) {
>>>> - if (prev_ctx == IN_USER)
>>>> + if (prev_ctx == IN_USER || prev_ctx == IN_GUEST)
>>>> context_tracking_user_enter(prev_ctx);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static inline void guest_enter(void)
>>>> vtime_guest_enter(current);
>>>> else
>>>> current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (context_tracking_is_enabled())
>>>> + context_tracking_user_enter(IN_GUEST);
>>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Couldnt we make
>>> rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
>>> conditional in include/linux/kvm_host.h (kvm_guest_enter)
>>>
>>> e.g. something like
>>> if (!context_tracking_is_enabled())
>>> rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
>>
>> Possibly. I considered the same, but I do not know whether
>> or not just rcu_user_enter / rcu_user_exit is enough.
>>
>> I could certainly try it out and see whether anything
>> explodes, but I am not convinced that is careful enough
>> when it comes to handling RCU code...
>>
>> Paul? :)
>
> That can fail for some odd combinations of Kconfig and boot parameters.
> As I understand it, you instead want the following:
>
> if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
>
> Frederic might know of a better approach.
Interesting, in what cases would that happen?
If context_tracking_is_enabled() we end up eventually
calling into rcu_user_enter & rcu_user_exit.
If it is not enabled, we call rcu_virt_note_context_switch.
In what cases would we need to call both?
I don't see exit-to-userspace do the things that
rcu_virt_note_context_switch does, and do not understand
why userspace is fine with that...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-05 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 16:35 [PATCH 0/4] rcu,nohz,kvm: " riel
2015-02-05 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu,nohz: add state parameter to context_tracking_user_enter/exit riel
2015-02-05 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu,nohz: run vtime_user_enter/exit only when state == IN_USER riel
2015-02-05 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] nohz,kvm: export context_tracking_user_enter/exit riel
2015-02-05 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm,rcu: use RCU extended quiescent state when running KVM guest riel
2015-02-05 16:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-05 16:52 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-05 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 18:09 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-02-05 18:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 18:59 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-05 19:02 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-05 19:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 20:19 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D3B1CF.1000301@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 4/4] kvm,rcu: use RCU extended quiescent state when running KVM guest' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).