LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: <rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tony@atomide.com>,
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:18:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EDF5DE.9010607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EDE4F1.10000@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Robert,
On 25/02/15 17:06, Robert Abel wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 25 Feb 2015 13:02, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> This creates platform devices for the children of child, but what about platform device for the child itself?
> It seems my first try in the other patch set wasn't so wrong after all. Maybe unconditionally call
>
> of_platform_device_create(child,...) and
> of_platform_populate(child, ...)?
>
>> Shouldn't the bus driver for that bus be responsible for spawning children of its bus?
> Well, a bus driver doesn't actually do much work here. The standard buses are just there for offset and so on.
> And that's my use case. Have one CS region with fixed settings and multiple devices in it.
>
> Creating code that in effect replicates what simple-bus does isn't worthwhile. Basically, it would replicate half the code that
> of_platform_populate goes through anyway without good reason.
>
> If complex bus-behavior is needed -- more than single-bus offset shifts --, a complex bus driver can always be written.
> Since it wouldn't match of_default_match_table, it itself would be responsible for creating children.
>
> I think I'll go with my first patch for this one, maybe call of_platform_decide_create unconditionally to check whether buses are
> available.
OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to of_platform_decide_create() behaves
for your case.
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 20:05 [PATCH 0/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fixes and " Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 1/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: don't undef DEBUG Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 3/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 4/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix debug output alignment Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 5/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: change get_gpmc_timing_reg output for DTS Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 6/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 7/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: calculate GPMCFCLKDIVIDER based on WAITMONITORINGTIME Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 8/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix WAITMONITORINGTIME divider bug Robert ABEL
2015-02-24 20:05 ` [PATCH 9/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix programming/showing reserved timing parameters Robert ABEL
2015-02-25 10:44 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 15:17 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 16:09 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 8/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix WAITMONITORINGTIME divider bug Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 17:07 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 17:17 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 17:22 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 17:27 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 16:33 ` [PATCH 7/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: calculate GPMCFCLKDIVIDER based on WAITMONITORINGTIME Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 17:20 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 17:24 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 17:20 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-26 11:34 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 13:31 ` [PATCH 6/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 13:24 ` [PATCH 5/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: change get_gpmc_timing_reg output for DTS Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 15:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-25 16:26 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix debug output alignment Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 15:06 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 16:18 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2015-02-25 16:23 ` Robert Abel
2015-02-25 16:26 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-25 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: don't undef DEBUG Roger Quadros
2015-02-24 20:07 ` [PATCH 0/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fixes and bus children Robert Abel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EDF5DE.9010607@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 3/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).