LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
"b.zolnierkie@samsung.com" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
"kgene@kernel.org" <kgene@kernel.org>,
"a.kesavan@samsung.com" <a.kesavan@samsung.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:53:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5D914.7030705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425295754-13376-5-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> This patch separates the PMU driver code from the low level
> CCI driver code.
>
> Introduces config options for both.
>
> ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL - controls the low level driver code for
> CCI400 ports.
> ARM_CCI400_PMU - controls the PMU driver code
> ARM_CCI400_COMMON - Common defintions for CCI400
>
> Also the ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL cannot be enabled by user. This
> should be selected by platforms which need it.
>
> This patch also changes:
> ARM_CCI - common code for probing the CCI devices. This can be
> used for adding support for newer CCI versions(e.g, CCI-500).
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/bus/Kconfig | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/arm-cci.h | 7 ++++++-
> 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> index b99729e..bdc189f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> @@ -43,12 +43,31 @@ config OMAP_INTERCONNECT
> help
> Driver to enable OMAP interconnect error handling driver.
>
> -config ARM_CCI
> - bool "ARM CCI driver support"
> +config ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL
> + bool
> depends on ARM && OF && CPU_V7
> + select ARM_CCI400_COMMON
> + help
> + Low level power management driver for CCI400 cache coherent
> + interconnect for ARM platforms.
> +
> +config ARM_CCI400_PMU
> + bool "ARM CCI400 PMU support"
> + depends on ARM || ARM64
> + depends on HW_PERF_EVENTS
> + select ARM_CCI400_COMMON
> help
> - Driver supporting the CCI cache coherent interconnect for ARM
> - platforms.
> + Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI cache coherent
> + interconnect.
> +
> + If unsure, say N
Just a query rather than comment. Before this change all platforms
having ARM_CCI and HW_PERF_EVENTS had CCI PMU enabled by default.
With this change, one has to select this option explicitly. I assume
that's fine, else this needs to be default 'y'
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64 Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm-cci: Rearrange code for splitting PMU vs driver code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:16 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm-cci: Abstract the CCI400 PMU speicific definitions Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm-cci: Get rid of secure transactions for PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 17:52 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:53 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-03-04 12:18 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm-cci: Fix CCI PMU event validation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:17 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-10 15:18 [PATCHv3 " Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-10 16:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-18 12:24 [PATCHv4 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64 Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-18 12:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support Suzuki K. Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F5D914.7030705@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=Punit.Agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=a.kesavan@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).