LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
	"b.zolnierkie@samsung.com" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	"kgene@kernel.org" <kgene@kernel.org>,
	"a.kesavan@samsung.com" <a.kesavan@samsung.com>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
	"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
	Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:00:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5DA8C.7080609@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425295754-13376-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>



On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
> The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
> driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains
> arm32 assembly and hence can't be built on ARM64. This patch splits
> the code to
>
>   - ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL driver - depends on ARM && V7
>   - ARM_CCI400_PMU driver
>
> Accessing the Peripheral ID2 register(PID2) on CCI-400, to detect
> the revision of the chipset, is a secure operation. Hence, it prevents
> us from running this on non-secure platforms. The issue is overcome by
> explicitly mentioning the revision number of the CCI PMU in the device tree
> binding. The device-tree binding has been updated with the new bindings.
>
> i.e,	arm-cci-400-pmu,r0 => revision 0
> 	arm-cci-400-pmu,r1 => revision 1
> 	arm-cci-400-pmu => (old) DEPRECATED
>
> The old binding has been DEPRECATED and must be used only on ARM32
> system with secure access. We don't have a reliable dynamic way to detect
> if the system is running secure. This series tries to use the best safe
> method by relying on the availability of MCPM(as it was prior to the series).
> It is upto the MCPM platform driver to decide, if the system is secure before
> it goes ahead and registers its drivers and pokes the CCI. This series doesn't
> address/solve the problem of MCPM. I will be happy to use a better approach,
> if there is any.
>
> Tested on (non-secure)TC2 and Juno.
>

For the series:
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> (on secure/MCPM TC2)

Regards,
Sudeep


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02 11:29 Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm-cci: Rearrange code for splitting PMU vs driver code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:35   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:16     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm-cci: Abstract the CCI400 PMU speicific definitions Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm-cci: Get rid of secure transactions for PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:44   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 17:52     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm-cci: Split the code for PMU vs driver support Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 15:53   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:18     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm-cci: Fix CCI PMU event validation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-03 16:00 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-03-04 12:17   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64 Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F5DA8C.7080609@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Punit.Agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=a.kesavan@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).