LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Michael Matz" <matz@suse.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dirk Müller" <dmueller@suse.com>,
"Suravee Suthikulanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Andreas Schwab" <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:16:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5506E5C5.3000209@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5396604.TRferrWZgF@wuerfel>
Hi,
On 03/11/2015 08:47 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 06:24:16 Alexander Graf wrote:
>> So after recompiling all of the distribution with newer binutils we now
>> have an openSUSE Factory tree that has 64k aligned 32bit binaries.
>>
>> Unfortunately however, the 32bit glibc has a bogus mmap() implementation
>> that hard codes 4k page size.
>>
>> With the patch below applied to glibc, I can successfully run 32bit user
>> space on Seattle with 64k PAGE_SIZE though. So I guess we'll need to fix
>> up glibc next.
>>
>> Do you know of anyone who's fluent enough in 32bit ARM assembly to
>> convert the hard coded assumptions in there to instead use a variable
>> that takes the actual host page size into account?
>
> I believe this is a kernel bug, and the kernel API for 32-bit emulation
> should always take the pgoff argument in 4KB units instead of PAGE_SIZE
> units, see the implementation of sys_mmap2 in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c.
>
> All user space programs that call mmap2 still need to make sure that
> their arguments are PAGE_SIZE aligned, but the libc need not care
> about this here.
What is the correct behavior for /proc/pid/pagemap, /proc/kpagecount, and
/proc/kpageflags for a AArch32 process running on an AArch64 kernel with
non-4K translation granule? Actual page frame number or units-of-4K frame number?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 15:46 [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size Alexander Graf
2014-12-04 18:18 ` Laura Abbott
2014-12-04 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-04 23:37 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-08 13:47 ` Michael Matz
2014-12-06 17:23 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-08 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-08 10:47 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-11 11:24 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-11 12:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-03-11 12:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-11 13:08 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-11 13:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-03-11 13:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-11 13:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-03-11 15:44 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-11 16:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-03-11 18:11 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-12 9:07 ` [PATCH] arm64: fix implementation of mmap2 compat syscall Andreas Schwab
2015-03-16 14:16 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2015-03-16 14:19 ` [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 21:15 ` Olof Johansson
2014-12-04 23:41 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-04 23:48 ` Olof Johansson
2014-12-05 10:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-05 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 12:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-05 12:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-18 13:40 ` Christopher Covington
2014-12-05 12:06 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-05 11:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 11:35 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-13 4:44 ` Jon Masters
2014-12-05 16:35 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5506E5C5.3000209@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dmueller@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matz@suse.de \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).