LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan@huawei.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:40:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550A0CDF.1060709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318164745.GA21564@htj.duckdns.org>
On 03/18/2015 12:47 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:12:09PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>
>> The previous patch makes it so the code skips over isolcpus when
>> building scheduler load balancing domains. This makes it hard to
>> see for a user which of the CPUs in a cpuset are participating in
>> load balancing, and which ones are isolated cpus.
>>
>> Add a cpuset.isolcpus file with info on which cpus in a cpuset are
>> isolated CPUs.
>>
>> This file is read-only for now. In the future we could extend things
>> so isolcpus can be changed at run time, for the root (system wide)
>> cpuset only.
>
> Didn't Li say that this is trivially computable from userland? I'm
> not sure this knob actually belongs to cpuset.
I don't know whether the information to compute this is
always visible from userland. I am happy to drop this
patch if Li prefers things that way, though.
Li?
--
All rights reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 16:12 [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/4] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-03-09 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched,isolcpu: make cpu_isolated_map visible outside scheduler riel
2015-03-09 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-03-09 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
2015-03-18 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-18 23:40 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-03-19 1:50 ` Zefan Li
2015-03-19 1:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-19 6:28 ` Zefan Li
2015-03-19 1:45 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-19 1:48 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-09 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuset,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus riel
2015-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/4] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets Rik van Riel
2015-03-19 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-03 23:00 [PATCH v4 " riel
2015-03-03 23:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550A0CDF.1060709@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).