LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftest
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:43:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581eb8800f6625ec8813fe21e9dce1fbdef4937.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
This test retrieves the uprobe's pt_regs in two different ways and
compares the contents in an arch-agnostic way.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c | 29 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..53f0e0fa1a53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include "test_task_pt_regs.skel.h"
+
+void test_task_pt_regs(void)
+{
+ struct test_task_pt_regs *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *uprobe_link;
+ size_t uprobe_offset;
+ ssize_t base_addr;
+ bool match;
+
+ base_addr = get_base_addr();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(base_addr, 0, "get_base_addr"))
+ return;
+ uprobe_offset = get_uprobe_offset(&get_base_addr, base_addr);
+
+ skel = test_task_pt_regs__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+ return;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->bss, "check_bss"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ uprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe(skel->progs.handle_uprobe,
+ false /* retprobe */,
+ 0 /* self pid */,
+ "/proc/self/exe",
+ uprobe_offset);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(uprobe_link, "attach_uprobe"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ skel->links.handle_uprobe = uprobe_link;
+
+ /* trigger & validate uprobe */
+ get_base_addr();
+
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_res, 1, "check_uprobe_res"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ match = !memcmp(&skel->bss->current_regs, &skel->bss->ctx_regs,
+ sizeof(skel->bss->current_regs));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(match, "check_regs_match");
+
+cleanup:
+ test_task_pt_regs__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6c059f1cfa1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct pt_regs current_regs = {};
+struct pt_regs ctx_regs = {};
+int uprobe_res = 0;
+
+SEC("uprobe/trigger_func")
+int handle_uprobe(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ struct task_struct *current;
+ struct pt_regs *regs;
+
+ current = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ regs = (struct pt_regs *) bpf_task_pt_regs(current);
+ __builtin_memcpy(¤t_regs, regs, sizeof(*regs));
+ __builtin_memcpy(&ctx_regs, ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
+
+ /* Prove that uprobe was run */
+ uprobe_res = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.33.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 2:43 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() helper Daniel Xu
2021-08-24 2:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: Add BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL_SINGLE macro Daniel Xu
2021-08-24 2:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] bpf: Consolidate task_struct BTF_ID declarations Daniel Xu
2021-08-24 2:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: Extend bpf_base_func_proto helpers with bpf_get_current_task_btf() Daniel Xu
2021-08-24 2:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() helper Daniel Xu
2021-08-24 2:43 ` Daniel Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5581eb8800f6625ec8813fe21e9dce1fbdef4937.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--to=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftest' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).