LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "'Jason Gunthorpe'" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
	"'linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org'"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org'"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_crb: relinquish locality on error path.
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 13:35:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9427B083@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502133246.GA6091@linux.intel.com>



> 
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:04:01PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_crb: relinquish locality on error path.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:19:12PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 09:00 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 19:12 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > > > > > In crb_map_io() function, __crb_request_locality() is
> > > > > > > > > called prior to crb_cmd_ready(), but if one of the
> > > > > > > > > consecutive function fails the flow bails out instead of
> > > > > > > > > trying to relinquish
> > > locality.
> > > > > > > > > This patch adds goto jump to __crb_relinquish_locality()
> > > > > > > > > on the error path.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Fixes: 888d867df441 (tpm: cmd_ready command can be
> > > > > > > > > issued only after granting
> > > > > > > > > locality)
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 10 +++++++---
> > > > > > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c index
> > > > > > > > > 7f78482cd157..34fbc6cb097b
> > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -511,8 +511,10 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct
> > > > > > > > > acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  	priv->regs_t = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf-
> > > > > > > > > >control_address,
> > > > > > > > >  				   sizeof(struct crb_regs_tail));
> > > > > > > > > -	if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_t))
> > > > > > > > > -		return PTR_ERR(priv->regs_t);
> > > > > > > > > +	if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_t)) {
> > > > > > > > > +		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->regs_t);
> > > > > > > > > +		goto out_relinquish_locality;
> > > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  	/*
> > > > > > > > >  	 * PTT HW bug w/a: wake up the device to access @@
> > > > > > > > > -520,7
> > > > > > > > > +522,7
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > @@
> > > > > > > > > static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct
> > > > > > > > > crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > > > >  	 */
> > > > > > > > >  	ret = crb_cmd_ready(dev, priv);
> > > > > > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > -		return ret;
> > > > > > > > > +		goto out_relinquish_locality;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  	pa_high = ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_cmd_pa_high);
> > > > > > > > >  	pa_low  = ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_cmd_pa_low);
> > > > > > > > > @@ -565,6 +567,8 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct
> > > > > > > > > acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  	crb_go_idle(dev, priv);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +out_relinquish_locality:
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >  	__crb_relinquish_locality(dev, priv, 0);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  	return ret;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks, please just call it before returning in the error path.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you please elaborate why, isn't the centralized exiting
> > > > > > > of functions preferred kernel coding style?
> > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.11/process/coding-style.h
> > > > > > > tml#
> > > > > > > cent
> > > > > > > ra
> > > > > > > lized-ex
> > > > > > > iting-of-functions
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You exit only from one location (not multiple) and not from a
> > > > > > nested context. Here you just add more complexity by doing this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where is the complexity ? I see it as a standard way of undoing on
> exit.
> > > > > Tomas
> > > >
> > > > Jarkko, can you please respond.
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Tomas
> > >
> > > I was away for Mon-Wed last week and did not work on TPM for Thu-Fri.
> > >
> > > My earlier comment was incorrect as there are two locations to exit
> > > (not sure how I managed to overlook the patch that way).
> > >
> > > Thus, I have only two very  minor requets:
> > >
> > > * Remove the extra newline (the last line addition in the patch).
> > Okay
> > > * Use just label named out as we have only one exception handler.
> > Cannot do that, as the bail out is prior to cmd_ready request so there is no
> need for go_idle which is under out label.
> > >
> > > I'll move on to testing, and if it it passes, I can do those updates myself.
> > Thanks,  I prefer to resend myself.
> >
> > Tomas
> 
> Add my tested-by as it is cosmectic change, thanks.


What change exactly? I had impression you've accepted the patch as is?
Thanks
Tomas

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-02 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-07 16:12 Tomas Winkler
2018-04-09 11:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-10  9:00   ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-04-10 12:33     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-10 20:25       ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-04-20 13:19         ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-04-24 16:03           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-24 17:48             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-24 20:10               ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-04-24 20:04             ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-05-02 13:32               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-05-02 13:35                 ` Winkler, Tomas [this message]
2018-05-03  6:35                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-05-03  6:42                     ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-05-04  8:16                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-05-05 21:07                         ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-05-09 12:26                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-05-09 21:49                             ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-05-11 10:18                               ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9427B083@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='RE: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_crb: relinquish locality on error path.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).