LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for zerocopy receive
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:01:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cd31eba-63b5-9160-0a2e-f441340df0d3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425062859.GA23914@infradead.org>



On 04/24/2018 11:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:27:21PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> When adding tcp mmap() implementation, I forgot that socket lock
>> had to be taken before current->mm->mmap_sem. syzbot eventually caught
>> the bug.
>>
>> Since we can not lock the socket in tcp mmap() handler we have to
>> split the operation in two phases.
>>
>> 1) mmap() on a tcp socket simply reserves VMA space, and nothing else.
>>   This operation does not involve any TCP locking.
>>
>> 2) setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, ...) implements
>>  the transfert of pages from skbs to one VMA.
>>   This operation only uses down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem) after
>>   holding TCP lock, thus solving the lockdep issue.
>>
>> This new implementation was suggested by Andy Lutomirski with great details.
> 
> Thanks, this looks much more sensible to me.
> 

Thanks Christoph

Note the high cost of zap_page_range(), needed to avoid -EBUSY being returned
from vm_insert_page() the second time TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE is used on one VMA.

Ideally a vm_replace_page() would avoid this cost ?

     6.51%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] unmap_page_range                                         
     5.90%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] vm_insert_page                                           
     4.85%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock                                           
     4.50%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mark_page_accessed                                       
     3.51%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_remove_rmap                                         
     2.99%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_add_file_rmap                                       
     2.53%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] release_pages                                            
     2.38%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] put_page                                                 
     2.37%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] smp_call_function_single                                 
     2.28%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __get_locked_pte                                         
     2.25%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] do_tcp_setsockopt.isra.35                                
     2.21%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_clear_age                         

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-25 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25  5:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] tcp: mmap: rework " Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25  5:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for " Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 13:01     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-04-25 15:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 16:04       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-25 16:20         ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:30           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-25 16:22         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-04-25 16:35           ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:44             ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 13:42   ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25  5:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests: net: tcp_mmap must use TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cd31eba-63b5-9160-0a2e-f441340df0d3@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for zerocopy receive' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).