LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Hale" <frankhale@gmail.com>
To: "Joachim Deguara" <joachim.deguara@amd.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Cal Peake" <cp@absolutedigital.net>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	"Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kernel ACPI Mailing List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	len.brown@intel.com, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI on Averatec 2370
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:52:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ebbd9b50708081652h55c85f9avab4500391c6b7ee0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708081642.00581.joachim.deguara@amd.com>

I have the latest BIOS update for my laptop which is buggy I suppose.
There has been only one update this year if my memory serves me
correctly. Is there any hope to fix this or am I at the mercy of the
hardware vendor which apparenlty doesn't look like they will release
another patch this year. Please forgive me as I am not a kernel
developer but a concerned user. I've sacrificed ACPI in favor of SMP
at this point, I don't know what it's buying me but the kernel boots
and works fine with the draw back that I have no ACPI and I have to
manually power the computer down by pressing the power button when it
halts. I can live with that if that is the solution but I haven't
really tracked as far as the high level dev stuff goes in this thread
and don't know what the solution might be.

On 8/8/07, Joachim Deguara <joachim.deguara@amd.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 02:06:31 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:37PM -0400, Cal Peake wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E lo == 0x04c14015
> > > > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E hi == 0x00000000
> > > > > lo & ENABLE_C1E_MASK == 0
> > > >
> > > > And yeah, that claims that C1E is not on, but:
> > > > > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1
> > >
> > > So it seems my initial debugging report was, err, incomplete. I failed to
> > > notice that the amd_apic_timer_broken function was getting called twice,
> > > once for each core.
> > >
> > > The second call shows this:
> > >
> > >   MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E == 0x14c14015
> >
> > Ah interesting. Ok finally that all starts making sense.
> >
> > Not sure why the MSR varies between cores though.
>
> This is a BIOS bug as the BIOS should have programmed the MSR the same for
> both cores.  See section 10.2.4 of the Rev F BKDG [1] (10.2.4.1 talks about
> the SMI case but a newer version of the doc not yet release has similar
> wording about both cores needing to have the bit set for the chipset case).
>
> -Joachim
>
> [1]
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/32559.pdf
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-08 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-29 18:05 Frank Hale
2007-07-29 18:13 ` Gabriel C
2007-07-29 18:45   ` Cal Peake
2007-07-29 18:58     ` Frank Hale
2007-07-29 19:58       ` Frank Hale
2007-07-30 15:20   ` Cal Peake
2007-08-02 17:50     ` Cal Peake
2007-08-02 19:09       ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-08-02 19:42         ` Cal Peake
2007-08-02 20:26           ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-08-02 20:30             ` Cal Peake
2007-08-02 20:51               ` Frank Hale
2007-08-02 21:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 21:53                 ` Cal Peake
2007-08-03 21:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-04  9:30                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-04 13:50                       ` Frank Hale
2007-08-05 14:26                       ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-07 22:15                     ` Cal Peake
2007-08-08  0:06                       ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08  0:53                         ` [PATCH] drop unneeded variable in amd_apic_timer_broken Cal Peake
2007-08-08 14:36                           ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 16:00                             ` Cal Peake
2007-08-08 18:25                               ` Tim Gardner
2007-08-08 14:41                         ` ACPI on Averatec 2370 Joachim Deguara
2007-08-08 23:52                           ` Frank Hale [this message]
2007-08-09  9:45                             ` Joachim Deguara
2007-08-03 15:52                 ` Ben Collins
2007-08-03 18:19                   ` Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ebbd9b50708081652h55c85f9avab4500391c6b7ee0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=frankhale@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=cp@absolutedigital.net \
    --cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: ACPI on Averatec 2370' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).