LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>
To: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
	Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Tsuchiya Yuto" <kitakar@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maximilian Luz" <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Brian Norris" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: Try waking the firmware until we get an interrupt
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 11:18:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f0b52be-8b9c-b015-6c5a-f2f470e37058@v0yd.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210914114813.15404-3-verdre@v0yd.nl>

On 9/14/21 13:48, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> It seems that the firmware of the 88W8897 card sometimes ignores or
> misses when we try to wake it up by writing to the firmware status
> register. This leads to the firmware wakeup timeout expiring and the
> driver resetting the card because we assume the firmware has hung up or
> crashed (unfortunately that's not unlikely with this card).
> 
> Turns out that most of the time the firmware actually didn't hang up,
> but simply "missed" our wakeup request and didn't send us an AWAKE
> event.
> 
> Trying again to read the firmware status register after a short timeout
> usually makes the firmware wake up as expected, so add a small retry
> loop to mwifiex_pm_wakeup_card() that looks at the interrupt status to
> check whether the card woke up.
> 
> The number of tries and timeout lengths for this were determined
> experimentally: The firmware usually takes about 500 us to wake up
> after we attempt to read the status register. In some cases where the
> firmware is very busy (for example while doing a bluetooth scan) it
> might even miss our requests for multiple milliseconds, which is why
> after 15 tries the waiting time gets increased to 10 ms. The maximum
> number of tries it took to wake the firmware when testing this was
> around 20, so a maximum number of 50 tries should give us plenty of
> safety margin.
> 
> A good reproducer for this issue is letting the firmware sleep and wake
> up in very short intervals, for example by pinging a device on the
> network every 0.1 seconds.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> index 0eff717ac5fa..7fea319e013c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> @@ -661,11 +661,15 @@ static void mwifiex_delay_for_sleep_cookie(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
>   			    "max count reached while accessing sleep cookie\n");
>   }
>   
> +#define N_WAKEUP_TRIES_SHORT_INTERVAL 15
> +#define N_WAKEUP_TRIES_LONG_INTERVAL 35
> +
>   /* This function wakes up the card by reading fw_status register. */
>   static int mwifiex_pm_wakeup_card(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>   {
>   	struct pcie_service_card *card = adapter->card;
>   	const struct mwifiex_pcie_card_reg *reg = card->pcie.reg;
> +	int n_tries = 0;
>   
>   	mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT,
>   		    "event: Wakeup device...\n");
> @@ -673,12 +677,29 @@ static int mwifiex_pm_wakeup_card(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>   	if (reg->sleep_cookie)
>   		mwifiex_pcie_dev_wakeup_delay(adapter);
>   
> -	/* Accessing fw_status register will wakeup device */
> -	if (mwifiex_write_reg(adapter, reg->fw_status, FIRMWARE_READY_PCIE)) {
> -		mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR,
> -			    "Writing fw_status register failed\n");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> +	/* Access the fw_status register to wake up the device.
> +	 * Since the 88W8897 firmware sometimes appears to ignore or miss
> +	 * that wakeup request, we continue trying until we receive an
> +	 * interrupt from the card.
> +	 */
> +	do {
> +		if (mwifiex_write_reg(adapter, reg->fw_status, FIRMWARE_READY_PCIE)) {
> +			mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR,
> +				    "Writing fw_status register failed\n");
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +
> +		n_tries++;
> +
> +		if (n_tries <= N_WAKEUP_TRIES_SHORT_INTERVAL)
> +			usleep_range(400, 700);
> +		else
> +			msleep(10);
> +	} while (n_tries <= N_WAKEUP_TRIES_SHORT_INTERVAL + N_WAKEUP_TRIES_LONG_INTERVAL &&
> +		 READ_ONCE(adapter->int_status) == 0);
> +
> +	mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT,
> +		    "event: Tried %d times until firmware woke up\n", n_tries);
>   
>   	if (reg->sleep_cookie) {
>   		mwifiex_pcie_dev_wakeup_delay(adapter);
> 

So I think I have another solution that might be a lot more elegant, how
about this:

try_again:
	n_tries++;

	mwifiex_write_reg(adapter, reg->fw_status, FIRMWARE_READY_PCIE);

	if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->card_wakeup_wait_q,
					     READ_ONCE(adapter->int_status) != 0,
					     WAKEUP_TRY_AGAIN_TIMEOUT) == 0 &&
	    n_tries < MAX_N_WAKEUP_TRIES) {
		goto try_again;
	}


and then call wake_up_interruptible() in the mwifiex_interrupt_status()
interrupt handler.

This solution should make sure we always keep wakeup latency to a minimum
and can still retry the register write if things didn't work.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-03  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14 11:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] mwifiex: Work around firmware bugs on 88W8897 chip Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-14 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mwifiex: Use non-posted PCI write when setting TX ring write pointer Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-22 11:17   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-22 12:08     ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-22 13:22       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-22 14:03   ` David Laight
2021-09-22 14:27     ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-22 15:54       ` David Laight
2021-09-30 14:27         ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-10-06 16:01           ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-14 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: Try waking the firmware until we get an interrupt Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-22 11:19   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-30 18:04     ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-30 20:58       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-30 21:07         ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-30 21:16           ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-03  9:18   ` Jonas Dreßler [this message]
2021-10-04 17:52     ` Brian Norris
2021-09-27 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mwifiex: Work around firmware bugs on 88W8897 chip Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f0b52be-8b9c-b015-6c5a-f2f470e37058@v0yd.nl \
    --to=verdre@v0yd.nl \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: Try waking the firmware until we get an interrupt' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).