From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F49BC282CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 19:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6246020675 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 19:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="i242Zrk+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387753AbfEVThI (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 15:37:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:43407 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732618AbfEVThG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 15:37:06 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z5so3189475lji.10; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:37:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kTgWZ3K7r6lt/65GKfZw+x+nRdHJpmGBMMkma7644Cc=; b=i242Zrk+hzyQGkdfw6ojwHiLhqdtCJt7wsI94VAFO+mwxfAcUxvGjE0cXpVavvPGxp NVHkOwxSCSPRHYtv0FmXIDMQaIQYhRADhnFxlByC85Agx2MQ/7Ql3Naj1RTGkOOyx9SY zkGDiwl/Y3anJniDbA7CKZ8aM9VNyfSe93gZ3ogJzFBLBCJOQB4qPgdL5ceIzfN7gUI0 1Ox9LqaZ0vDHrbq3dTf7M9EAHYkUN4wTsf2aAJb8vX9F3Uh0CGkg3tgziF3M8QMotrRM MN8ReZOdHd442VrzsAHYnsJvQGH9O0Rsu4Eo5qpAcgk6u4/3eeALC6V398UbR7GipvFw 7qxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kTgWZ3K7r6lt/65GKfZw+x+nRdHJpmGBMMkma7644Cc=; b=KHD0RiTtKu7wbtPa43egFQrRrgZnKxpxgX49d/kKYa23tXveTOAbgpFb3ev3/T+yry 9WrMRKa6hxxWeQwF906b9ULN0muWrD30wyHty2pNOkJThG0xrs8D2aN6nn3yhl5nVLe6 DNPjCrA2zfwJDbLHPImb/dIiun0hDAMdYiNHQLXr/4XebNCB0h4bm6uOhsuv+lsM7QiD AqIabX8uO8aixMGSA80RV9LSW4v7IjZytNxkqMgN1ZZS2umZfLxFeKnhJ8El/LU8qRR+ a/CL7zDenDkga2zzL96UVxeJkNr21YLt/qKDl/oxellJ3lJnMer9p6+x0qesaKcrOVVt 3cTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWJlfmXHaD2XT7EEK/vTSRmoWYzgVHSfDg+m+H5TLRLDwzPEmUp onSdBJ4pMQAdzSx2jZu2hg0EDGPt X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqww7E+qykMqOU4l7XPoS+TDnZZfFMiOgj6vaK3ZeFXfOjy7KFBjxCC9vKaPrW5F57JpCN5pbA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:890c:: with SMTP id d12mr41217504lji.107.1558553823588; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.17] (dma4.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.24.56.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m63sm5475047lje.44.2019.05.22.12.37.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 May 2019 12:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] LM36274 Introduction To: Dan Murphy , pavel@ucw.cz, broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190522192733.13422-1-dmurphy@ti.com> From: Jacek Anaszewski Message-ID: <6501a8b5-8068-4c9d-6b51-ef00fa72c6d5@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 21:37:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522192733.13422-1-dmurphy@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan, On 5/22/19 9:27 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Hello > > This is patch set v4 for the LM36274. There were no changes made > to this patch set except to rebase this on top of the latest TI LMU common code > patchset. Why the rebase was needed? leds-lm36274.c was already including leds-ti-lmu-common.h. > This patch set was rebased on the series at: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=393071 > > Dan > > Dan Murphy (6): > regulator: lm363x: Make the gpio register enable flexible > dt-bindings: mfd: Add lm36274 bindings to ti-lmu > mfd: ti-lmu: Add LM36274 support to the ti-lmu > regulator: lm363x: Add support for LM36274 > dt-bindings: leds: Add LED bindings for the LM36274 > leds: lm36274: Introduce the TI LM36274 LED driver > > .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm36274.txt | 82 +++++++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt | 54 ++++++ > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 7 + > drivers/leds/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 5 +- > drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c | 14 ++ > drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c | 56 +++++- > include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu-register.h | 23 +++ > include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h | 4 + > 11 files changed, 416 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm36274.txt > create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c > -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski