From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759888AbYBZGTp (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:19:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753362AbYBZGTi (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:19:38 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:25370 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752008AbYBZGTh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:19:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=Q1RmR3byS803nBI+D254rYt1RoZcRAUiVG/MvATPZ1mrvhqSBEILEw2EGS/ddVXtt eNUCqi3fISwupvo/mB/CA== Message-ID: <6599ad830802252219p77f41917u7c6c137c8e5448e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:19:28 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Li Zefan" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, balbir@in.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com, "Pavel Emelianov" , "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" , "YAMAMOTO Takashi" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <47C3862D.8080603@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080223224725.115590000@menage.corp.google.com> <47C3862D.8080603@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Li Zefan wrote: > > Should those pathces be rebased againt 2.6.25-rc3 ? > No, because they're against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1, which is already has (I think) any of the new bits in 2.6.25-rc3 that would be affected by these patches. Paul