LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
	Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: wangle6@huawei.com, xiaoqian9@huawei.com, shaolexi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:52:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65fe396a-b10d-2388-8229-05fd43d58927@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a5b0f50-b071-2d1c-5277-b6d7f652c257@huawei.com>

On 8/8/21 11:51 PM, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> On 2021/8/9 11:01, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>> I think it is simpler to just put a "might_sleep()" in 
>> __down_common() which is the function where sleep can actually happen.
>>
>
> If the actual atomic context hibernation occurs, the corresponding 
> alarm log is generated in __schedule_bug().
>     __schedule()
>         --> schedule_debug()
>             --> __schedule_bug()
>
> However, "might_sleep()" indicates the possibility of sleep, so that 
> code writers can identify and fix the problem as soon as possible, but 
> does not trigger atomic context sleep.
>
> Is it better to put "might_sleep()" in each down API entry than 
> __down_common() to help identify potential code problems? 

Putting "might_sleep()" in each down_*() functions mean that whenever we 
add a new API function, we have to remember to add "might_sleep()". If 
we put it in down_common(), it will work for any newly added API 
function in the future even though I doubt we will add any.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09  2:12 Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-09  3:01 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-09  3:51   ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-09 12:52     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-08-09 14:33       ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-13 17:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-13 18:47     ` Waiman Long
2021-08-13 14:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:39 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/semaphore: " tip-bot2 for Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-31 11:13 ` [PATCH] semaphore: " Guenter Roeck
2021-08-31 11:39   ` Hanjun Guo
2021-08-31 12:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-31 11:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-31 12:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-31 12:34     ` Will Deacon
2021-08-31 17:42     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-09-01  8:37     ` [tip: smp/urgent] drivers: base: cacheinfo: Get rid of DEFINE_SMP_CALL_CACHE_FUNCTION() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65fe396a-b10d-2388-8229-05fd43d58927@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shaolexi@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoqian9@huawei.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).