LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<wangweiyang2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next,v2] efi/libstub: arm32: Use "align" for the size alignment
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:48:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bd8e85e-2ff8-f833-0b5b-2868b61f2f34@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFE1Gv41TowKZHqkwn+WVLsAOqJSFbi706KbMC0G_rqgw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ard,
Thanks for your reply.
In my understanding address and size need to meet consistent alignment
constraints,If I understand wrong, please reject this patch.
Best,
GaoSheng.
在 2021/11/4 17:26, Ard Biesheuvel 写道:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 03:04, Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>> We are doing page-based allocations, and both the address
>> and size must meet alignment constraints, so using "align"
>> for the size alignment is a better choice.
>>
> Why is it a better choice? If I allocate a 2 MB aligned block of
> memory, why is it better to align the size to a multiple of 2 MB as
> well?
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c
>> index 724155b9e10d..7b7159bb035d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(unsigned long size,
>> if (align < EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN)
>> align = EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN;
>>
>> - size = round_up(size, EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN);
>> + size = round_up(size, align);
>>
>> /* count the suitable slots in each memory map entry */
>> for (map_offset = 0; map_offset < map_size; map_offset += desc_size) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c
>> index 8ee9eb2b9039..d6d27e8c23f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_low_alloc_above(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
>> if (align < EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN)
>> align = EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN;
>>
>> - size = round_up(size, EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN);
>> + size = round_up(size, align);
>> nr_pages = size / EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
>> for (i = 0; i < map_size / desc_size; i++) {
>> efi_memory_desc_t *desc;
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 2:05 Gaosheng Cui
2021-11-04 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-08 12:48 ` cuigaosheng [this message]
2021-11-08 12:56 ` cuigaosheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bd8e85e-2ff8-f833-0b5b-2868b61f2f34@huawei.com \
--to=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH -next,v2] efi/libstub: arm32: Use "align" for the size alignment' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).