LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang 14.0.0+
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:33:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71d76c41-7f9b-6d60-ba4f-0cd84596b457@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQFgYgavTP2ZG9Y16XBVdPuJ98J_Ty1OrQy1GXHq6JjQQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 8/17/21 16:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:25 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/17/2021 11:03 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 09:55:28PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>>> If you/Gustavo would prefer, I can upgrade that check to
>>>>
>>>> ifneq ($(call cc-option, -Wunreachable-code-fallthrough),)
>>>>
>>>> I was just trying to save a call to the compiler, as that is more expensive
>>>> than a shell test call.
>>>
>>> I prefer the option test -- this means no changes are needed on the
>>> kernel build side if it ever finds itself backported to earlier versions
>>> (and it handles the current case of "14" not meaning "absolute latest").
>>>
>>> More specifically, I think you want this (untested):
>>
>> That should work but since -Wunreachable-code-fallthrough is off by
>> default, I did not really see a reason to include it in KBUILD_CFLAGS. I
>> do not have a strong opinion though, your version is smaller than mine
>> is so we can just go with that. I'll defer to Gustavo on it since he has
>> put in all of the work cleaning up the warnings.
> 
> 
> 
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ed4a94d6451046a51ef393cd62f00710820a7e8
> 
>    did two things:
> 
>  (1) Change the -Wimplicit-fallthrough behavior so that it fits
>       to our use in the kernel
> 
>  (2) Add a new option -Wunreachable-code-fallthrough
>       that works like the previous -Wimplicit-fallthrough of
>       Clang <= 13.0.0
> 
> 
> They are separate things.
> 
> Checking the presence of -Wunreachable-code-fallthrough
> does not make sense since we are only interested in (1) here.
> 
> 
> 
> So, checking the Clang version is sensible and matches
> the explanation in the comment block.
> 
> 
> Moreover, using $(shell test ...) is less expensive than cc-option.
> 
> 
> If you want to make it even faster, you can use only
> built-in functions, like this:
> 
> 
> # Warn about unmarked fall-throughs in switch statement.
> # Clang prior to 14.0.0 warned on unreachable fallthroughs with
> # -Wimplicit-fallthrough, which is unacceptable due to IS_ENABLED().
> # https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
> ifeq ($(firstword $(sort $(CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION) 140000)),140000)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wimplicit-fallthrough
> endif
> 
> 
> 
> The $(sort ...) is alphabetical sort, not numeric sort.
> It works for us because the minimum Clang version is 10.0.1
> (that is CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION is always 6-digit)
> 
> It will break when Clang version 100.0.0 is released.
> 
> But, before that, we will raise the minimum supported clang version,
> and this conditional will go away.

I like this. :)

I'm going to make the 0-day robot test it in my tree, first.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo



  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17  0:56 Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-17  4:16 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-17  4:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-17  4:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-08-17  4:55     ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-17 18:03       ` Kees Cook
2021-08-17 18:25         ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-17 21:17           ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-08-17 21:33             ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2021-08-17 23:06               ` Kees Cook
2021-08-17 23:23                 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-17 23:40                   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-08-18  4:15                   ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-08-18  4:27                   ` Philip Li
2021-08-18  4:45                     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-08-18  7:31                       ` Philip Li
2021-08-18 12:12                   ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 21:09             ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71d76c41-7f9b-6d60-ba4f-0cd84596b457@embeddedor.com \
    --to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang 14.0.0+' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).