LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mfd: da9063: Replace model with type
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:45:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7db6e995-70db-8bdf-e425-14c52e2592ea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180530052110.GB27396@yexl-desktop>

On 05/30/2018 07:21 AM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> Hi, Marek
> 
> On 05/26, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/26/2018 11:16 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>>>
>>> [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
>>> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613
>>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next
>>> config: x86_64-randconfig-x002-201820 (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
>>> reproduce:
>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>         make ARCH=x86_64 
>>>
>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>    In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:10:0,
>>>                     from drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:16:
>>>    drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function 'da9063_regulator_probe':
>>>    drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>                ^
>>>    include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>>>      if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :   \
>>>                                  ^~~~
>>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>       ^~
>>>    drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>                ^
>>>    include/linux/compiler.h:58:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>>>      if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :   \
>>>                                              ^~~~
>>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>       ^~
>>>    drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>                ^
>>>    include/linux/compiler.h:69:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>>>       ______r = !!(cond);     \
>>>                    ^~~~
>>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>>>       if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>>>       ^~
>>>    drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:749:10: error: 'struct da9063' has no member named 'model'
>>>        da9063->model);
>>>              ^~
>>>
>>> vim +/if +744 drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c
>>
>> Is it testing this patch without the other patches in the series or at
>> least 1/6 ?
> 
> It was tested with the whole patch series as you can see in https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613.

Ha, I see the problem. Thanks for confirming it's checked with the whole
series.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-30 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23 11:42 [PATCH 1/6] mfd: da9063: Rename PMIC_DA9063 to PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063 Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] mfd: da9063: Replace model with type Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:50   ` Mark Brown
2018-05-23 11:55   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-23 12:15     ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-26  9:16   ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-26  9:58     ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-30  5:21       ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-05-30 10:45         ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2018-05-26 11:01   ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-23 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] mfd: da9063: Add DA9063L type Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 12:00   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-24 13:06   ` Steve Twiss
2018-05-23 11:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] mfd: da9063: Disallow RTC on DA9063L Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 12:00   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-24 12:50   ` Steve Twiss
2018-05-29  7:55     ` Lee Jones
2018-05-30 10:59       ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] mfd: da9063: Handle less LDOs " Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:50   ` Mark Brown
2018-05-23 12:05   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-23 11:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: da9063: Add DA9063L support Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:50   ` Mark Brown
2018-05-23 12:06   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-24 11:48   ` Steve Twiss
2018-05-24 12:32     ` Steve Twiss
2018-05-24 14:50       ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-24 17:30         ` Steve Twiss
2018-05-30 11:24           ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-31 12:45             ` Steve Twiss
2018-06-02  9:59               ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-29  7:46         ` Lee Jones
2018-05-30 11:26           ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] mfd: da9063: Rename PMIC_DA9063 to PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063 Mark Brown
2018-05-23 11:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-24 12:03 ` Steve Twiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7db6e995-70db-8bdf-e425-14c52e2592ea@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
    --cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).