LKML Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Jürg Billeter" <>
To: Oleg Nesterov <>
Cc: Andrew Morton <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Eric Biederman <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] prctl: add PR_[GS]ET_KILLABLE
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 16:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/31, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > 
> > > Could you explain your use-case? Why a shell wants to use
> > 
> > To guarantee that there won't be any runaway processes, i.e., ensure
> > that no descendants (background helper daemons or misbehaving
> > processes) survive when the child process is terminated.
> We already have PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER.
> Perhaps we can finally add PR_KILL_MY_DESCENDANTS_ON_EXIT? This was already
> discussed some time ago, but I can't find the previous discussion... Simple
> to implement.

This would definitely be an option. You mentioned it last October in
the PR_SET_PDEATHSIG_PROC discussion¹. However, as PID namespaces
already exist and appear to be a good fit for the most part, I think it
makes sense to just add the missing pieces to PID namespaces instead of
duplicating part of the PID namespace functionality.

Also, based on Eric's comment in that other discussion about
no_new_privs not being allowed to increase the attack surface,
to setuid children). In which case the only potential benefit would be
that it still allows the child to kill arbitrary processes, as far as I
can tell.

> > And to prevent children from killing their ancestors.
> OK, this is the only reason for CLONE_NEWPID which I can understand so far.
> Not that I understand why this is that useful ;)

The overall goal is increasing isolation between (some) child processes
and the rest of the system. Isolation from runaway processes and
isolation from signals are independent aspects and it could be useful
to control them independently. However, I also expect it to be common
that both are wanted at the same time.



  reply index

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-30  7:52 [PATCH] " Jürg Billeter
2018-07-30 10:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-30 19:32   ` Jürg Billeter
2018-07-30 19:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-31  7:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Jürg Billeter
2018-07-31 14:39   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-31 16:12     ` Jürg Billeter
2018-08-01 14:19       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-03 10:15         ` Jürg Billeter [this message]
2018-08-03 12:14           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-03 13:34           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-08-03 14:39             ` Jürg Billeter
2018-07-31 16:26 ` [PATCH] " Jann Horn
2018-08-01  7:43   ` Jürg Billeter
2018-08-01  7:56     ` Jann Horn
2018-08-03 14:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] fork: do not rely on SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE for init check Jürg Billeter
2018-08-03 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] prctl: add PR_[GS]ET_KILLABLE Jürg Billeter
2018-09-06 22:42     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/8.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ \
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone