LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Cc: mdf@kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgoncalv@redhat.com,
	hao.wu@intel.com, matthew.gerlach@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/6] fpga: image-load: enable cancel of image upload
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 06:13:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8351febc-2493-89c3-86ea-9e7660b6d3ee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <839aa95e-c3d1-1f60-1b36-20d29445e61f@intel.com>


On 9/10/21 4:38 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
>
> On 9/10/21 7:55 AM, Xu Yilun wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:18:46PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote:
>>> Extend the FPGA Image Load class driver to include a cancel IOCTL that
>>> can be used to request that an image upload be canceled. The IOCTL may
>>> return EBUSY if it cannot be canceled by software or ENODEV if there
>>> is no update in progress.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> v15:
>>>   - Compare to previous patch:
>>>       [PATCH v14 6/6] fpga: sec-mgr: enable cancel of secure update
>>>   - Changed file, symbol, and config names to reflect the new driver name
>>>   - Cancel is now initiated by IOCT instead of sysfs
>>>   - Removed signed-off/reviewed-by tags
>>> v14:
>>>   - Updated ABI documentation date and kernel version
>>> v13:
>>>    - No change
>>> v12:
>>>    - Updated Date and KernelVersion fields in ABI documentation
>>> v11:
>>>    - No change
>>> v10:
>>>    - Rebased to 5.12-rc2 next
>>>    - Updated Date and KernelVersion in ABI documentation
>>> v9:
>>>    - Updated Date and KernelVersion in ABI documentation
>>> v8:
>>>    - No change
>>> v7:
>>>    - Changed Date in documentation file to December 2020
>>> v6:
>>>    - No change
>>> v5:
>>>    - No change
>>> v4:
>>>    - Changed from "Intel FPGA Security Manager" to FPGA Security Manager"
>>>      and removed unnecessary references to "Intel".
>>>    - Changed: iops -> sops, imgr -> smgr, IFPGA_ -> FPGA_, ifpga_ to fpga_
>>> v3:
>>>    - No change
>>> v2:
>>>    - Bumped documentation date and version
>>>    - Minor code cleanup per review comments
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst |  6 ++++
>>>   drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c         | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h   |  1 +
>>>   include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h   |  1 +
>>>   4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>>> index 3d5eb51223e3..763e7833a6ea 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>>> @@ -37,3 +37,9 @@ FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS:
>>>   Collect status for an on-going image upload. The status returned includes
>>>   how much data remains to be transferred, the progress of the image load,
>>>   and error information in the case of a failure.
>>> +
>>> +FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL:
>>> +
>>> +Request that a on-going image upload be cancelled. This IOCTL may return
>>> +EBUSY if it cannot be cancelled by software or ENODEV if there is no update
>>> +in progress.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>>> index 6ec0a39f07b3..c32e4b1ea35a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,24 @@ static void fpga_image_dev_error(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>>>   	imgld->lops->cancel(imgld);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static int fpga_image_prog_transition(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>>> +				      enum fpga_image_prog new_progress)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>>> +	if (imgld->request_cancel) {
>>> +		imgld->err_progress = imgld->progress;
>>> +		imgld->err_code = FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_CANCELED;
>>> +		imgld->lops->cancel(imgld);
>>> +		ret = -ECANCELED;
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		imgld->progress = new_progress;
>>> +	}
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static void fpga_image_prog_complete(struct fpga_image_load *imgld)
>>>   {
>>>   	mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>>> @@ -77,8 +95,10 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work)
>>>   		goto modput_exit;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> -	fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING);
>>> -	while (imgld->remaining_size) {
>>> +	if (fpga_image_prog_transition(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING))
>>> +		goto done;
>>> +
>>> +	while (imgld->remaining_size && !imgld->request_cancel) {
>>>   		ret = imgld->lops->write_blk(imgld, offset);
>>>   		if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE) {
>>>   			fpga_image_dev_error(imgld, ret);
>>> @@ -88,7 +108,9 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work)
>>>   		offset = size - imgld->remaining_size;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> -	fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING);
>>> +	if (fpga_image_prog_transition(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING))
>>> +		goto done;
>>> +
>>>   	ret = imgld->lops->poll_complete(imgld);
>>>   	if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE)
>>>   		fpga_image_dev_error(imgld, ret);
>>> @@ -159,6 +181,7 @@ static int fpga_image_load_ioctl_write(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>>>   	imgld->remaining_size = wb.size;
>>>   	imgld->err_code = FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE;
>>>   	imgld->progress = FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_STARTING;
>>> +	imgld->request_cancel = false;
>>>   	reinit_completion(&imgld->update_done);
>>>   	schedule_work(&imgld->work);
>>>   	return 0;
>>> @@ -189,7 +212,7 @@ static long fpga_image_load_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>>>   				  unsigned long arg)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct fpga_image_load *imgld = filp->private_data;
>>> -	int ret = -ENOTTY;
>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>>   
>>>   	mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>>>   
>>> @@ -200,6 +223,17 @@ static long fpga_image_load_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>>>   	case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS:
>>>   		ret = fpga_image_load_ioctl_status(imgld, arg);
>>>   		break;
>>> +	case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL:
>>> +		if (imgld->progress == FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING)
>>> +			ret = -EBUSY;
>>> +		else if (imgld->progress == FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_IDLE)
>>> +			ret = -ENODEV;
>>> +		else
>>> +			imgld->request_cancel = true;
>>> +		break;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		ret = -ENOTTY;
>>> +		break;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>>   	mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>>> @@ -374,6 +408,9 @@ void fpga_image_load_unregister(struct fpga_image_load *imgld)
>>>   		goto unregister;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> +	if (imgld->progress != FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING)
>>> +		imgld->request_cancel = true;
>>> +
>> Why we cancel the programing rather than waiting for programing done?
> This isn't new - it is the way the security manager was implemented.
>
> Updates can take up to 40 minutes for the N3000. If a person tries
> to unload the driver modules, should we hang for 40 minutes? Or should
> we try to cancel the update and allow the module to be unloaded?
> I think it is reasonable to cancel the update (if possible) under these
> circumstances. What do you think?

I do not think stalling a shutdown for 40 minutes is good.

Is there a chance that cancelling would brick the card?

After restarting, can the hw detect an interrupted update ?

Tom

>
> - Russ
>
>> Thanks,
>> Yilun
>>
>>>   	mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>>>   	wait_for_completion(&imgld->update_done);
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h
>>> index 68f3105b51d2..4e51b9fd1724 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-image-load.h
>>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct fpga_image_load {
>>>   	enum fpga_image_prog progress;
>>>   	enum fpga_image_prog err_progress;	/* progress at time of failure */
>>>   	enum fpga_image_err err_code;		/* image load error code */
>>> +	bool request_cancel;
>>>   	bool driver_unload;
>>>   	struct eventfd_ctx *finished;
>>>   	void *priv;
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>>> index 6a995bcc0fb7..8d0dfa1f9b77 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum fpga_image_err {
>>>   
>>>   #define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_WRITE	_IOW(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 0, struct fpga_image_write)
>>>   #define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS	_IOR(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 1, struct fpga_image_status)
>>> +#define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_CANCEL	_IO(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 2)
>>>   
>>>   /**
>>>    * FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_WRITE - _IOW(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 0,
>>> -- 
>>> 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-11 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09  2:18 [PATCH v15 0/6] FPGA Image Load (previously Security Manager) Russ Weight
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 1/6] fpga: image-load: fpga image load class driver Russ Weight
2021-09-10  6:46   ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-10 20:47     ` Russ Weight
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 2/6] fpga: image-load: enable image loads Russ Weight
2021-09-10  8:22   ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-10 23:18     ` Russ Weight
2021-09-13  6:48       ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-13  9:36         ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-21 19:08           ` Russ Weight
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 3/6] fpga: image-load: signal eventfd when complete Russ Weight
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 4/6] fpga: image-load: add status ioctl Russ Weight
2021-09-10  8:50   ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-10 23:23     ` Russ Weight
2021-09-11 18:12       ` Tom Rix
2021-09-13  8:24         ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 5/6] fpga: image-load: create status sysfs node Russ Weight
2021-09-10  8:52   ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-10 23:30     ` Russ Weight
2021-09-11 17:58       ` Tom Rix
2021-09-13  8:27         ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v15 6/6] fpga: image-load: enable cancel of image upload Russ Weight
2021-09-10 14:55   ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-10 23:38     ` Russ Weight
2021-09-11 13:13       ` Tom Rix [this message]
2021-09-13 10:00         ` Xu Yilun
2021-09-21 20:43           ` Russ Weight
     [not found] ` <20210912023739.4078-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-09-21 18:36   ` [PATCH v15 2/6] fpga: image-load: enable image loads Russ Weight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8351febc-2493-89c3-86ea-9e7660b6d3ee@redhat.com \
    --to=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@intel.com \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).