LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pekka Enberg" <>
To: "CooperYuan Cooper" <>
Subject: Re: About closed-source module use GPL module function
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:52:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>


On Jan 30, 2008 8:41 AM, CooperYuan Cooper <> wrote:
> Now I am porting a device driver to Linux, its source code is not opened.
> In this module, I use some interface functions exported from GPL
> module through EXPORT_SYMBOL macros. (not EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL), For
> example, register_sound_dsp() and so on.
> Do I violate GPL? How to solve it?

This list is probably a not good source for (free) legal advice but
the simplest way to be sure is to release the source code under GPLv2.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-30  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30  6:41 CooperYuan Cooper
2008-01-30  7:52 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-02-04 14:18 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: About closed-source module use GPL module function' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).