LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Getting empty callchain from perf_callchain_kernel()
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 17:22:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <842A0302-9B36-4FBF-ADF7-9C6749E8C5BE@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPcB9emh9T23sixx-91mg2wL6kgrYF4MVfmuTCE0SsD=8efcQ@mail.gmail.com>
> On May 19, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 5:48 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 17, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/17/19 11:40 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>>>> +Alexei, Daniel, and bpf
>>>>
>>>>> On May 17, 2019, at 2:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:15:39PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, I think the actual problem is that bpf_get_stackid_tp (and maybe
>>>>>> some other bfp functions) is now broken, or, strating an unwind
>>>>>> directly inside a bpf program will end up strangely. It have following
>>>>>> kernel message:
>>>>>
>>>>> Urgh, what is that bpf_get_stackid_tp() doing to get the regs? I can't
>>>>> follow.
>>>>
>>>> I guess we need something like the following? (we should be able to
>>>> optimize the PER_CPU stuff).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Song
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git i/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c w/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>>>> index f92d6ad5e080..c525149028a7 100644
>>>> --- i/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>>>> +++ w/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>>>> @@ -696,11 +696,13 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto_tp = {
>>>> .arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, bpf_stackid_tp_regs);
>>>> BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_tp, void *, tp_buff, struct bpf_map *, map,
>>>> u64, flags)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct pt_regs *regs = *(struct pt_regs **)tp_buff;
>>>> + struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_stackid_tp_regs);
>>>>
>>>> + perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
>>>
>>> No. pt_regs is already passed in. It's the first argument.
>>> If we call perf_fetch_caller_regs() again the stack trace will be wrong.
>>> bpf prog should not see itself, interpreter or all the frames in between.
>>
>> Thanks Alexei! I get it now.
>>
>> In bpf_get_stackid_tp(), the pt_regs is get by dereferencing the first field
>> of tp_buff:
>>
>> struct pt_regs *regs = *(struct pt_regs **)tp_buff;
>>
>> tp_buff points to something like
>>
>> struct sched_switch_args {
>> unsigned long long pad;
>> char prev_comm[16];
>> int prev_pid;
>> int prev_prio;
>> long long prev_state;
>> char next_comm[16];
>> int next_pid;
>> int next_prio;
>> };
>>
>> where the first field "pad" is a pointer to pt_regs.
>>
>> @Kairui, I think you confirmed that current code will give empty call trace
>> with ORC unwinder? If that's the case, can we add regs->ip back? (as in the
>> first email of this thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Song
>>
>
> Hi thanks for the suggestion, yes we can add it should be good an idea
> to always have IP when stack trace is not available.
> But stack trace is actually still broken, it will always give only one
> level of stacktrace (the IP).
I think this is still the best fix/workaround here? And only one level
of stack trace should be OK for tracepoint?
Thanks,
Song
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Kairui Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 23:51 Song Liu
2019-05-17 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 8:15 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-17 8:32 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-17 16:22 ` Song Liu
2019-05-17 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 18:40 ` Song Liu
2019-05-17 21:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-17 21:48 ` Song Liu
2019-05-19 18:07 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-20 17:22 ` Song Liu [this message]
2019-05-22 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-19 18:06 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-20 17:16 ` Song Liu
2019-05-20 17:19 ` Song Liu
2019-05-22 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-22 14:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-22 17:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 23:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 6:48 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 8:27 ` Song Liu
2019-05-23 9:11 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 13:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 14:50 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 15:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 16:41 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 17:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-24 2:20 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-24 23:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-27 11:57 ` Kairui Song
2019-06-06 16:04 ` Song Liu
2019-06-06 23:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-11 21:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-24 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 13:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 3:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-12 14:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-12 14:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 18:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-17 16:32 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=842A0302-9B36-4FBF-ADF7-9C6749E8C5BE@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--subject='Re: Getting empty callchain from perf_callchain_kernel()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).