LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	mka@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 1/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Clean code reading/writing regs/cmds
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:17:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85758e97-8c0c-5c4e-24ad-d3e8b2b01d3c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200306155707.RFT.1.I1b754137e8089e46cf33fc2ea270734ec3847ec4@changeid>

Hi,

On 3/7/2020 5:29 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This patch makes two changes, both of which should be no-ops:
>
> 1. Make read_tcs_reg() / read_tcs_cmd() symmetric to write_tcs_reg() /
>    write_tcs_cmd().

i agree that there are two different write function doing same thing except last addition (RSC_DRV_CMD_OFFSET * cmd_id)

can you please rename write_tcs_cmd() to write_tcs_reg(), add above operation in it, and then remove existing write_tcs_reg().
this way we have only one read and one write function.

so at the end we will two function as,

static u32 read_tcs_reg(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, int cmd_id)
{
        return readl_relaxed(drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id +
                             RSC_DRV_CMD_OFFSET * cmd_id);
}

static void write_tcs_reg(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
                          u32 data)
{
        writel_relaxed(data, drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id +
                       RSC_DRV_CMD_OFFSET * cmd_id);
}

>
> 2. Change the order of operations in the above functions to make it
>    more obvious to me what the math is doing.  Specifically first you
>    want to find the right TCS, then the right register, and then
>    multiply by the command ID if necessary.
With above change, i don't think you need to re-order this.
specifically from tcs->base, we find right "reg" first and if it happens to be tcs then intended tcs, and then cmd inside tcs.

Thanks,
Maulik

> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index e278fc11fe5c..5c88b8cd5bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -61,28 +61,33 @@
>  #define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED		BIT(8)
>  #define CMD_STATUS_COMPL		BIT(16)
>  
> -static u32 read_tcs_reg(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, int cmd_id)
> +static u32 read_tcs_cmd(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, int cmd_id)
>  {
> -	return readl_relaxed(drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id +
> +	return readl_relaxed(drv->tcs_base + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id + reg +
>  			     RSC_DRV_CMD_OFFSET * cmd_id);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 read_tcs_reg(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id)
> +{
> +	return readl_relaxed(drv->tcs_base + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id + reg);
> +}
> +
>  static void write_tcs_cmd(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
>  			  u32 data)
>  {
> -	writel_relaxed(data, drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id +
> +	writel_relaxed(data, drv->tcs_base + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id + reg +
>  		       RSC_DRV_CMD_OFFSET * cmd_id);
>  }
>  
>  static void write_tcs_reg(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id, u32 data)
>  {
> -	writel_relaxed(data, drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id);
> +	writel_relaxed(data, drv->tcs_base + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id + reg);
>  }
>  
>  static void write_tcs_reg_sync(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id,
>  			       u32 data)
>  {
> -	writel(data, drv->tcs_base + reg + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id);
> +	writel(data, drv->tcs_base + RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id + reg);
>  	for (;;) {
>  		if (data == readl(drv->tcs_base + reg +
>  				  RSC_DRV_TCS_OFFSET * tcs_id))
> @@ -94,7 +99,7 @@ static void write_tcs_reg_sync(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id,
>  static bool tcs_is_free(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
>  {
>  	return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use) &&
> -	       read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id, 0);
> +	       read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id);
>  }
>  
>  static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_of_type(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
> @@ -212,7 +217,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tcs_tx_done(int irq, void *p)
>  	const struct tcs_request *req;
>  	struct tcs_cmd *cmd;
>  
> -	irq_status = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_IRQ_STATUS, 0, 0);
> +	irq_status = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_IRQ_STATUS, 0);
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(i, &irq_status, BITS_PER_LONG) {
>  		req = get_req_from_tcs(drv, i);
> @@ -226,7 +231,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tcs_tx_done(int irq, void *p)
>  			u32 sts;
>  
>  			cmd = &req->cmds[j];
> -			sts = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_STATUS, i, j);
> +			sts = read_tcs_cmd(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_STATUS, i, j);
>  			if (!(sts & CMD_STATUS_ISSUED) ||
>  			   ((req->wait_for_compl || cmd->wait) &&
>  			   !(sts & CMD_STATUS_COMPL))) {
> @@ -265,7 +270,7 @@ static void __tcs_buffer_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
>  	cmd_msgid |= msg->wait_for_compl ? CMD_MSGID_RESP_REQ : 0;
>  	cmd_msgid |= CMD_MSGID_WRITE;
>  
> -	cmd_complete = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_WAIT_FOR_CMPL, tcs_id, 0);
> +	cmd_complete = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_WAIT_FOR_CMPL, tcs_id);
>  
>  	for (i = 0, j = cmd_id; i < msg->num_cmds; i++, j++) {
>  		cmd = &msg->cmds[i];
> @@ -281,7 +286,7 @@ static void __tcs_buffer_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
>  	}
>  
>  	write_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_WAIT_FOR_CMPL, tcs_id, cmd_complete);
> -	cmd_enable |= read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id, 0);
> +	cmd_enable |= read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id);
>  	write_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id, cmd_enable);
>  }
>  
> @@ -294,7 +299,7 @@ static void __tcs_trigger(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
>  	 * While clearing ensure that the AMC mode trigger is cleared
>  	 * and then the mode enable is cleared.
>  	 */
> -	enable = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, 0);
> +	enable = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id);
>  	enable &= ~TCS_AMC_MODE_TRIGGER;
>  	write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, enable);
>  	enable &= ~TCS_AMC_MODE_ENABLE;
> @@ -319,10 +324,10 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
>  		if (tcs_is_free(drv, tcs_id))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		curr_enabled = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id, 0);
> +		curr_enabled = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id);
>  
>  		for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
> -			addr = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR, tcs_id, j);
> +			addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR, tcs_id, j);
>  			for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
>  				if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
>  					return -EBUSY;

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-06 23:59 [RFT PATCH 0/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Cleanup / add lots of comments Douglas Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 1/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Clean code reading/writing regs/cmds Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11  8:47   ` Maulik Shah [this message]
2020-03-11 15:03     ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-11 16:17       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-03-11 19:30         ` Stephen Boyd
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 2/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Document the register layout better Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11  9:35   ` Maulik Shah
2020-03-11 15:27     ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-11 18:49       ` Evan Green
2020-03-11 20:08       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-03-11 22:35         ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 3/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Fold tcs_ctrl_write() into its single caller Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11  9:50   ` Maulik Shah
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 4/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Remove get_tcs_of_type() abstraction Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11 12:02   ` Maulik Shah
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 5/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: A lot of comments Douglas Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 6/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Only use "tcs_in_use" for ACTIVE_ONLY Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11  0:33   ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 7/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Warning if tcs_write() used for non-active Douglas Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 8/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: spin_lock_irqsave() for tcs_invalidate() Douglas Anderson
2020-03-06 23:59 ` [RFT PATCH 9/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Kill cmd_cache and find_match() with fire Douglas Anderson
2020-03-11  0:35   ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-11  9:48 ` [RFT PATCH 0/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Cleanup / add lots of comments Maulik Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85758e97-8c0c-5c4e-24ad-d3e8b2b01d3c@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFT PATCH 1/9] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Clean code reading/writing regs/cmds' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).