LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <>
To: "" <>,
	"" <>
Cc: "" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/events: block: dev_t via driver core for plug and unplug events
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 20:56:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419192341.GC20941@vader>

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:24 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> We quiesce and freeze the queue before tearing it down, so it won't be
> NULL while we're still doing I/O. Cc'ing Bart in case I'm lying to you,
> though ;)

blk_cleanup_queue() waits until all I/O requests have finished. Since the
block layer tracing code is triggered from inside the code that processes a
request it is safe to access the request pointer from inside the tracing code.
But I think the question was about the parent of the request queue kobj
instead of about the request queue pointer, the device structure that is
embedded in struct gendisk? I think that parent can disappear at any time.
Most block drivers call del_gendisk() before they call blk_cleanup_queue().
Unless I'm overlooking something I think the request queue will need to
obtain a reference to the gendisk device from inside blk_register_queue()
and drop that reference from inside blk_cleanup_queue() to make it safe for
the tracing code to access struct gendisk.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-19 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-13 13:07 [PATCH 0/2] tracing/events: block: bring more on a par with blktrace Steffen Maier
2018-04-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing/events: block: track and print if unplug was explicit or schedule Steffen Maier
2018-04-13 14:16   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing/events: block: dev_t via driver core for plug and unplug events Steffen Maier
2018-04-15  8:31   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-16 16:33     ` Steffen Maier
2018-04-19 19:24       ` Omar Sandoval
2018-04-19 20:56         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-04-24 14:49           ` Steffen Maier
2018-04-27 16:38             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-13 13:07 ` [RFC] tracing/events: block: also try to get dev_t via driver core for some events Steffen Maier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/events: block: dev_t via driver core for plug and unplug events' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).