LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Calculate and verify inode checksums
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 02:58:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86716762-8041-4209-961C-5C0BAB139C5B@dilger.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110406224547.GT32706@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
On 2011-04-06, at 4:45 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> This patch introduces to ext4 the ability to calculate and verify inode
> checksums. This requires the use of a new ro compatibility flag and some
> accompanying e2fsprogs patches to provide the relevant features in tune2fs and
> e2fsck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 6 ++++--
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 4daaf2b..8815928 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ struct ext4_inode {
> } masix2;
> } osd2; /* OS dependent 2 */
> __le16 i_extra_isize;
> - __le16 i_pad1;
> + __le16 i_checksum; /* crc16(sb_uuid+inodenum+inode) */
In previous discussions, we thought about using part/all of the l_i_reserved2 field to store the inode checksum. The inode checksum is important enough to warrant a field in the core inode, so that it also works on upgraded filesystems.
> +static __le16 ext4_inode_csum(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_inode *raw)
> +{
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> + int offset = offsetof(struct ext4_inode, i_checksum);
> + __le32 inum = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
> + __u16 crc = 0;
> +
> + if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> + EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_INODE_CSUM) &&
> + le16_to_cpu(raw->i_extra_isize) >= 4) {
If this field remains in the large part of the inode, then this check is incorrect. i_extra_isize is itself only valid if (s_inode_size is > EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE), otherwise it points at the next inode's i_mode.
Also, instead of hard-coding ">= 4" here, it would be better to use EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw, EXT4_I(inode), i_checksum). Probably no reason to put "ei" on the stack at all.
> + crc = crc16(~0, sbi->s_es->s_uuid, sizeof(sbi->s_es->s_uuid));
> + crc = crc16(crc, (__u8 *)&inum, sizeof(inum));
> + crc = crc16(crc, (__u8 *)raw, offset);
> + offset += sizeof(raw->i_checksum); /* skip checksum */
> + /* for checksum of struct ext4_inode do the rest...*/
> + if (ei->i_extra_isize > 4)
> + crc = crc16(crc, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
> + ei->i_extra_isize - 4);
> + }
> +
> + return cpu_to_le16(crc);
> +}
> +
> +static int ext4_inode_csum_verify(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_inode *raw)
> +{
> + if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> + EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_INODE_CSUM) &&
> + (raw->i_checksum != ext4_inode_csum(inode, raw)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static inline int ext4_begin_ordered_truncate(struct inode *inode,
> loff_t new_size)
> {
> @@ -4802,7 +4837,8 @@ struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> struct ext4_inode *raw_inode;
> struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
> struct inode *inode;
> - journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
> + journal_t *journal = sbi->s_journal;
> long ret;
> int block;
>
> @@ -4916,6 +4952,14 @@ struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> } else
> ei->i_extra_isize = 0;
>
> + if (!ext4_inode_csum_verify(inode, raw_inode)) {
> + EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "checksum invalid (%u != %u)",
> + le16_to_cpu(ext4_inode_csum(inode, raw_inode)),
> + le16_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_checksum));
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto bad_inode;
> + }
> +
> EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_ctime, inode, raw_inode);
> EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_mtime, inode, raw_inode);
> EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_atime, inode, raw_inode);
> @@ -5138,6 +5182,12 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t *handle,
> raw_inode->i_version_hi =
> cpu_to_le32(inode->i_version >> 32);
> raw_inode->i_extra_isize = cpu_to_le16(ei->i_extra_isize);
> +
> + if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> + EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_INODE_CSUM) &&
> + EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, ei, i_checksum))
> + raw_inode->i_checksum =
> + ext4_inode_csum(inode, raw_inode);
> }
>
> BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
Cheers, Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-08 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 22:44 [PATCH 0/2] Add inode checksum support to ext4 Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-06 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Calculate and verify inode checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-07 0:52 ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-07 16:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-07 17:10 ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-08 18:50 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-08 19:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-08 8:58 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2011-04-08 19:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-08 22:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-06 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs: Add support for toggling, verifying, and fixing " Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-08 9:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-08 19:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-08 23:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-12 2:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-08 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add inode checksum support to ext4 Mingming Cao
2011-04-08 20:17 ` Joel Becker
2011-07-27 8:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-07-27 9:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-07-28 16:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <CAOQ4uxiOpwX2-Nfh9wJ7wSmAnbj9bh1+d9C95-N5D-8saRr6ww@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-28 18:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-07-29 9:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-07-28 22:07 ` Joel Becker
2011-07-29 9:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-07-29 13:19 ` Joel Becker
2011-07-30 7:25 ` Coly Li
2011-07-31 7:08 ` Joel Becker
2011-07-31 23:52 ` Coly Li
2011-08-01 4:57 ` Joel Becker
2011-08-01 5:04 ` Joel Becker
2011-08-01 7:16 ` Coly Li
2011-04-20 17:40 ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-20 22:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-04-21 0:25 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86716762-8041-4209-961C-5C0BAB139C5B@dilger.ca \
--to=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Calculate and verify inode checksums' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).