From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757712AbXGDGIS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751529AbXGDGIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:08:10 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:31430 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752103AbXGDGIJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:08:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fWMtubUCU5O0K4+Y9eVm8MbkdyE0WPJzbdl05OgmAHabCjk3bUN5CKfy3PqEZhkHWOh6BWYWlQIBLoQLPmPV2etleMUDypYKS3oXnspg8pd0OiLv1oWkGyk1vkJewrnJRMYscGrk2uV2n8fbrCOaLQk/+Bzv4tBy8bTMoIzd2Qo= Message-ID: <86802c440707032308w3f596ff1gd17faaded43ff894@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 23:08:08 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Greg KH" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Andi Kleen" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <20070703060155.GB19086@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706291326.43563.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <200707021536.37814.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <20070703051129.GA18420@kroah.com> <86802c440707022233g2021b49dg48534f813f628585@mail.gmail.com> <20070703060155.GB19086@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/2/07, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:33:12PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Ok, so two drivers might need this, but not the whole usb core, right? > > And even if you do have another usb mapping, is that a real problem? > USB keyboards and mice are very slow. Some other USB media may need that too. if you have one two way system and put all dimm on node1 and use memtest to look at performance. you may agree to reduce the cross node mem access as less as possible. YH