LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart
@ 2008-03-07 23:02 Yinghai Lu
  2008-03-07 23:20 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-03-07 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Andi Kleen
  Cc: kernel list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: x86_64_reserve_dma32_free.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=x86_64_reserve_dma32_free.patch, Size: 4357 bytes --]

[PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart

one system with 256g when numa is disabled said:

Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
This costs you 64 MB of RAM
Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (ffff8101c0000000,65536K)
Kernel panic - not syncing: Not enough memory for aperture
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc4-x86-latest.git #33

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff84037c62>] panic+0xb2/0x190
 [<ffffffff840381fc>] ? release_console_sem+0x7c/0x250
 [<ffffffff847b1628>] ? __alloc_bootmem_nopanic+0x48/0x90
 [<ffffffff847b0ac9>] ? free_bootmem+0x29/0x50
 [<ffffffff847ac1f7>] gart_iommu_hole_init+0x5e7/0x680
 [<ffffffff847b255b>] ? alloc_large_system_hash+0x16b/0x310
 [<ffffffff84506a2f>] ? _etext+0x0/0x1
 [<ffffffff847a2e8c>] pci_iommu_alloc+0x1c/0x40
 [<ffffffff847ac795>] mem_init+0x45/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8479ff35>] start_kernel+0x295/0x380
 [<ffffffff8479f1c2>] _sinittext+0x1c2/0x230

the root cause is : memmap PMD is too big,
[ffffe200e0600000-ffffe200e07fffff] PMD ->ffff81383c000000 on node 0
almost near 4G..., and vmemmap_alloc_block will use up the ram under 4G.

solution will be:
1. make memmap allocation get memory above 4G...
2. reserve some dma32 range early before we try to set up memmap for all.
and release that before pci_iommu_alloc, so gart or swiotlb could get some
range under 4g limit for sure.

the patch is using method 2.
because method1 may need more code to handle SPARSEMEM and SPASEMEM_VMEMMAP

will get
Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
This costs you 64 MB of RAM
Mapping aperture over 65536 KB of RAM @ 4000000
Memory: 264245736k/268959744k available (8484k kernel code, 4187464k reserved, 4004k data, 724k init)

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/dmar.h>
+#include <linux/bootmem.h>
+#include <asm/proto.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/gart.h>
 #include <asm/calgary.h>
@@ -286,8 +288,55 @@ static __init int iommu_setup(char *p)
 }
 early_param("iommu", iommu_setup);
 
+static __initdata void *dma32_bootmem_ptr;
+static unsigned long dma32_bootmem_size __initdata = (128ULL<<20);
+
+static int __init parse_dma32_size_opt(char *p)
+{
+	if (!p)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	dma32_bootmem_size = memparse(p, &p);
+	return 0;
+}
+early_param("dma32_size", parse_dma32_size_opt);
+
+void __init dma32_reserve_bootmem(void)
+{
+	unsigned long size, align;
+	if (end_pfn <= MAX_DMA32_PFN)
+		return;
+
+	align = 64ULL<<20;
+	size = round_up(dma32_bootmem_size, align);
+	dma32_bootmem_ptr = __alloc_bootmem_nopanic(size, align,
+				 __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
+	if (dma32_bootmem_ptr)
+		dma32_bootmem_size = size;
+	else
+		dma32_bootmem_size = 0;
+}
+static void __init dma32_free_bootmem(void)
+{
+	int node;
+
+	if (end_pfn <= MAX_DMA32_PFN)
+		return;
+
+	if (!dma32_bootmem_ptr)
+		return;
+
+	for_each_online_node(node)
+		free_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), __pa(dma32_bootmem_ptr),
+				  dma32_bootmem_size);
+
+	dma32_bootmem_ptr = NULL;
+	dma32_bootmem_size = 0;
+}
+
 void __init pci_iommu_alloc(void)
 {
+	/* free the range so iommu could get some range less than 4G */
+	dma32_free_bootmem();
 	/*
 	 * The order of these functions is important for
 	 * fall-back/fail-over reasons
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -401,6 +401,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 	early_res_to_bootmem();
 
+	dma32_reserve_bootmem();
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
 	/*
 	 * Reserve low memory region for sleep support.
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/pci_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86/pci_64.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/pci_64.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ extern int (*pci_config_write)(int seg, 
 
 
 
+extern void dma32_reserve_bootmem(void);
 extern void pci_iommu_alloc(void);
 
 /* The PCI address space does equal the physical memory

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart
  2008-03-07 23:02 [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-03-07 23:20 ` Andi Kleen
  2008-03-08  1:45   ` Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-03-07 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, kernel list

On Saturday 08 March 2008 00:02:50 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> 



>solution will be:
>1. make memmap allocation get memory above 4G...
>2. reserve some dma32 range early before we try to set up memmap for all.
>and release that before pci_iommu_alloc, so gart or swiotlb could get some
>range under 4g limit for sure.

Funny we had (1) before vmemmap for some time, but it looks like
that regressed with vmemmap Anyways I think (1) alone should be enough, is (2) 
really needed?

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart
  2008-03-07 23:20 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2008-03-08  1:45   ` Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-03-08  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, kernel list

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 March 2008 00:02:50 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  >solution will be:
>  >1. make memmap allocation get memory above 4G...
>  >2. reserve some dma32 range early before we try to set up memmap for all.
>  >and release that before pci_iommu_alloc, so gart or swiotlb could get some
>  >range under 4g limit for sure.
>
>  Funny we had (1) before vmemmap for some time, but it looks like
>  that regressed with vmemmap Anyways I think (1) alone should be enough, is (2)
>  really needed?

even vmemmap is disabled, still need (2).

(1) is not there yet.

YH

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-08  1:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-07 23:02 [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart Yinghai Lu
2008-03-07 23:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-08  1:45   ` Yinghai Lu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).