From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738AbYKFHKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:10:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752231AbYKFHK2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:10:28 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.230]:15440 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbYKFHK1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:10:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=LNoL/T+E3fDotvPgw9BEgdJvFcmXU2O3oRwqzFMRarSwvkVBBDTjPXO6TMPPR+fXdt kiP741LUqb3aEPSV4XDPUAtdPYdWmNUM2vcTaLf//DxP8znr2BVq4ppe8gTsLcGY7wB0 daezy5+DjQXDx1JAZhT+iG6Y6kAI9o2QcFVu0= Message-ID: <86802c440811052310o1cd9d75bma489d9ab66ed514a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:10:26 -0800 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Andrew Morton" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Ben Hutchings" In-Reply-To: <491296B2.6090700@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4910C845.4060909@kernel.org> <20081106062608.GC6384@elte.hu> <86802c440811052242taefec24ndf661b1c65ca457e@mail.gmail.com> <4912943C.2090801@zytor.com> <86802c440811052300y279bd289t74b437a2053b97d1@mail.gmail.com> <491296B2.6090700@zytor.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c0b3afe6b3090e2c Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:52 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Clean-up sidenote: i think we can now remove the VISWS #ifdef portion >>>>> for good? Mind sending a patch for that too? >>>> >>>> could remove CONFIG_PARAVIRT too.. Jeremy? >>>> >>> This seems like a bad idea, especially for the embedded guys. >> >> make one CONFIG_NR_IRQS for them before working out one dyna_array is >> get merged? >> > > Ah, sorry... I missed the context and thought you meant removing > CONFIG_PARAVIRT in general. I mean make NR_IRQS bigger like IO_APIC is set when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is set. YH