LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru>,
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define the EF_AS_NO_RANDOM e_flag bit
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:21:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871wll8h2t.wl@betelheise.deep.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070123211612.GJ29911@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
At Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:16:12 -0500,
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:06:45AM +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > Should we introduce per-arch asm/elf.h files to hold the relevant flag definitions then?
>
> On some architectures there are no bits left. On others you'd need to go
> through whomever maintains the relevant psABI to get a bit officially
> allocated. Really, it is very bad idea to use e_flags for this.
How does one find the relevant maintainers?
Even just the specs are harder to find in the authoritative location,
given the OSDL and FSG merge: the psabi documents at
http://www.linux-foundation.org/spec/refspecs/
all 404...
> If all you care about is running setuid LISP programs, you'd much better put
> your energy into fixing the buggy ELF dumper in it.
>
> Jakub
regards, Samium Gromoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-23 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-21 23:23 [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness Samium Gromoff
2007-01-21 23:34 ` David Wagner
2007-01-22 0:36 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-01-22 1:53 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-02-24 9:40 ` Florian Weimer
2007-02-24 13:33 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-02-24 13:49 ` Florian Weimer
2007-01-22 15:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-22 17:39 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 8:48 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-23 14:03 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 15:41 ` Alan
2007-01-23 20:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] Mechanism to turn of ASR on a per-ELF binary basis Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] Define the EF_AS_NO_RANDOM e_flag bit Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 20:50 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-01-23 21:06 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 21:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-01-23 21:54 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-01-23 23:21 ` Samium Gromoff [this message]
2007-01-24 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-29 1:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-01-23 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make the EF_AS_NO_RANDOM e_flag bit disable PF_RANDOMIZE Samium Gromoff
2007-02-24 9:51 ` [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness Florian Weimer
2007-02-24 13:36 ` Samium Gromoff
2007-01-31 9:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-01 8:05 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871wll8h2t.wl@betelheise.deep.net \
--to=_deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define the EF_AS_NO_RANDOM e_flag bit' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).