LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:08:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739lu9eg6.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (Paul Mundt's message of "Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:56:54 +0900")

Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
>> implementation.  Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
>> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>
> This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
> keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
> better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.

Sounds fine to me.

Thanks for the review,

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-07 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-07  0:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  5:49   ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 16:56   ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 17:08     ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-04-07 22:35       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08  0:38         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08  5:01           ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile & OMAP1 Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07  5:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 14:58   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:31       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08  0:32         ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8739lu9eg6.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@suse.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).