LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> To: sxwjean@me.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, npiggin@gmail.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, sandipan@linux.ibm.com, efremov@linux.com, peterx@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for esr register Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:53:14 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <874kc3njxh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210726143053.532839-1-sxwjean@me.com> sxwjean@me.com writes: > From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com> > > Create an anonymous union for dsisr and esr regsiters, we can reference > esr to get the exception detail when CONFIG_4xx=y or CONFIG_BOOKE=y. > Otherwise, reference dsisr. This makes code more clear. > > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++++- > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++++- > arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c | 2 ++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/machine_check.c | 4 ++-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h > index 3e5d470a6155..c252d04b1206 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h > @@ -44,7 +44,10 @@ struct pt_regs > #endif > unsigned long trap; > unsigned long dar; > - unsigned long dsisr; > + union { > + unsigned long dsisr; > + unsigned long esr; > + }; I don't mind doing that. > unsigned long result; > }; > }; > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > index 7004cfea3f5f..e357288b5f34 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > @@ -53,7 +53,10 @@ struct pt_regs > /* N.B. for critical exceptions on 4xx, the dar and dsisr > fields are overloaded to hold srr0 and srr1. */ > unsigned long dar; /* Fault registers */ > - unsigned long dsisr; /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */ > + union { > + unsigned long dsisr; /* on Book-S used for DSISR */ > + unsigned long esr; /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */ > + }; > unsigned long result; /* Result of a system call */ > }; But I'm not sure about the use of anonymous unions in UAPI headers. Old compilers don't support them, so there's a risk of breakage. I'd rather we didn't touch the uapi version. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > index 185beb290580..f74af8f9133c 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) > trap == INTERRUPT_DATA_STORAGE || > trap == INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT) { > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_4xx) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE)) > - pr_cont("DEAR: "REG" ESR: "REG" ", regs->dar, regs->dsisr); > + pr_cont("DEAR: "REG" ESR: "REG" ", regs->dar, regs->esr); > else > pr_cont("DAR: "REG" DSISR: %08lx ", regs->dar, regs->dsisr); > } > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c > index 0a0a33eb0d28..00789ad2c4a3 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c > @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void __init pt_regs_check(void) > offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, dar)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, dsisr) != > offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, dsisr)); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, esr) != > + offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, esr)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, result) != > offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, result)); > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > index dfbce527c98e..2164f5705a0b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c > @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static inline int check_io_access(struct pt_regs *regs) > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS > /* On 4xx, the reason for the machine check or program exception > is in the ESR. */ > -#define get_reason(regs) ((regs)->dsisr) > +#define get_reason(regs) ((regs)->esr) > #define REASON_FP ESR_FP > #define REASON_ILLEGAL (ESR_PIL | ESR_PUO) > #define REASON_PRIVILEGED ESR_PPR > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > index a8d0ce85d39a..62953d4e7c93 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > @@ -541,7 +541,11 @@ static __always_inline void __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > long err; > > - err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_4xx) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE)) > + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->esr); > + else > + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr); As Christophe said, I don't thinks this is an improvement. It makes the code less readable. If anyone is confused about what is passed to ___do_page_fault() they can either read the comment above it, or look at the definition of pt_regs to see that esr and dsisr share storage. cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 6:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-26 14:30 [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for esr register sxwjean 2021-07-26 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] powerpc/64e: Get esr offset with _ESR macro sxwjean 2021-07-26 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for dear register sxwjean 2021-08-05 10:09 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-08-06 3:16 ` Xiongwei Song 2021-07-26 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] powerpc/64e: Get dear offset with _DEAR macro sxwjean 2021-08-05 10:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for esr register Christophe Leroy 2021-08-06 3:16 ` Xiongwei Song 2021-08-06 7:32 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-08-06 13:22 ` Xiongwei Song 2021-08-06 6:53 ` Michael Ellerman [this message] 2021-08-06 13:14 ` Xiongwei Song 2021-08-06 14:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=874kc3njxh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \ --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --cc=efremov@linux.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=peterx@redhat.com \ --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=sxwjean@gmail.com \ --cc=sxwjean@me.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).