LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
@ 2014-12-27 19:24 Oscar Forner Martinez
2014-12-27 20:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Oscar Forner Martinez @ 2014-12-27 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zajec5; +Cc: linux-wireless, linux-kernel, Oscar Forner Martinez
Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
---
drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
index 19f6796..84d4a95 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
@@ -79,7 +79,9 @@ static int bcma_chipco_watchdog_ticks_per_ms(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
if (cc->capabilities & BCMA_CC_CAP_PMU) {
if (bus->chipinfo.id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4706)
- /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP clock */
+ /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP
+ * clock
+ */
return bcma_chipco_get_alp_clock(cc) / 4000;
else
/* based on 32KHz ILP clock */
@@ -97,7 +99,8 @@ int bcma_chipco_watchdog_register(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
wdt.driver_data = cc;
wdt.timer_set = bcma_chipco_watchdog_timer_set_wdt;
wdt.timer_set_ms = bcma_chipco_watchdog_timer_set_ms_wdt;
- wdt.max_timer_ms = bcma_chipco_watchdog_get_max_timer(cc) / cc->ticks_per_ms;
+ wdt.max_timer_ms =
+ bcma_chipco_watchdog_get_max_timer(cc) / cc->ticks_per_ms;
pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "bcm47xx-wdt",
cc->core->bus->num, &wdt,
@@ -335,7 +338,8 @@ void bcma_chipco_serial_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
| BCMA_CC_CORECTL_UARTCLKEN);
}
} else {
- bcma_err(cc->core->bus, "serial not supported on this device ccrev: 0x%x\n", ccrev);
+ bcma_err(cc->core->bus, "serial not supported on this device ccrev: 0x%x\n",
+ ccrev);
return;
}
--
2.2.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-27 19:24 [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line Oscar Forner Martinez
@ 2014-12-27 20:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CADZ0Xg++nexnzmuaOp+MHXBbODwSpoEYNcbDU=X9tNYbzh=W-w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-01-15 12:42 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2014-12-27 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oscar Forner Martinez; +Cc: linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 748 bytes --]
On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
<oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
Thanks for the next version :)
1) You missed version number. Something like
git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH V3"
(you saying for the future).
2) I'm OK with your changes, but when checking the patch I get some errors like
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: DOS line endings
(I used ./scripts/checkpatch.pl, see attached checkpatch log).
I think that "trailing whitespace" errors are caused by DOS line
endings, because I don't see anything wrong about your code.
Is there something wrong with your emacs? git-send-email shouldn't
malform patches I believe.
[-- Attachment #2: bcma.checkpatch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#62: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:82:
+^I^I^I/* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP^M$
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#63: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:83:
+^I^I^I * clock^M$
ERROR: DOS line endings
#64: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:84:
+^I^I^I */^M$
ERROR: DOS line endings
#73: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:102:
+^Iwdt.max_timer_ms =^M$
ERROR: DOS line endings
#74: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:103:
+^I^Ibcma_chipco_watchdog_get_max_timer(cc) / cc->ticks_per_ms;^M$
ERROR: DOS line endings
#83: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:341:
+^I^Ibcma_err(cc->core->bus, "serial not supported on this device ccrev: 0x%x\n",^M$
ERROR: DOS line endings
#84: FILE: drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c:342:
+^I^I^I ccrev);^M$
total: 7 errors, 0 warnings, 28 lines checked
NOTE: whitespace errors detected, you may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or
scripts/cleanfile
bcma.patch has style problems, please review.
If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
[not found] ` <CADZ0XgJ=LU3n55MxcHUMdX7uRcOm-m+=DFLGDi6PPkj+5=y1sg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-12-27 23:42 ` Rafał Miłecki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2014-12-27 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oscar Forner Martinez; +Cc: linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 27 December 2014 at 23:04, Oscar Forner Martinez
<oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-12-27 21:14 GMT+00:00 Oscar Forner Martinez
> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>:
>>
>> 2014-12-27 20:19 GMT+00:00 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in
>>> > several lines.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the next version :)
>>>
>>> 1) You missed version number. Something like
>>> git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH V3"
>>> (you saying for the future).
>>
>>
>> Yes, sorry I forgot to put -v 3 in git format-patch.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) I'm OK with your changes, but when checking the patch I get some
>>> errors like
>>> ERROR: trailing whitespace
>>> ERROR: DOS line endings
>>> (I used ./scripts/checkpatch.pl, see attached checkpatch log).
>>>
>>> I think that "trailing whitespace" errors are caused by DOS line
>>> endings, because I don't see anything wrong about your code.
>>>
>>> Is there something wrong with your emacs? git-send-email shouldn't
>>> malform patches I believe.
>>
>>
>> When I run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with my patch does not show any error
>> (please find attached the output). I will try to run it with the one from my
>> e-mail. My only configuration in the .emacs file is: (setq c-default-style
>> "linux").
>
>
> I ran the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with the patch got it from
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=141970834908165 and it does not show
> any error. Could you please tell me how I have to check in the same way as
> you did?
False alarm, sorry. GMail changed sth again or my browser
change/update broke saving e-mails.
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-27 19:24 [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line Oscar Forner Martinez
2014-12-27 20:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 5:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-12-29 7:16 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-15 12:42 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2014-12-27 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oscar Forner Martinez; +Cc: linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
<oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Kalle: will you pick this patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2014-12-28 5:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-12-28 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-29 7:16 ` Kalle Valo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-12-28 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>
As for the comment-line changes... 80+ chars are allowed for better readability.
So, please don't do that.
[ Checkpatch should not warn on this especially for comments. ]
- Sedat -
> Kalle: will you pick this patch?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-28 5:50 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2014-12-28 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 9:12 ` Sedat Dilek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2014-12-28 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sedat Dilek
Cc: Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 28 December 2014 at 06:50, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>
>
> As for the comment-line changes... 80+ chars are allowed for better readability.
> So, please don't do that.
> [ Checkpatch should not warn on this especially for comments. ]
We almost always split long comments into separated lines in the
kernel. What's different with this case?
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-28 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2014-12-28 9:12 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-12-28 14:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-12-28 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 December 2014 at 06:50, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>
>>
>> As for the comment-line changes... 80+ chars are allowed for better readability.
>> So, please don't do that.
>> [ Checkpatch should not warn on this especially for comments. ]
>
> We almost always split long comments into separated lines in the
> kernel. What's different with this case?
>
1st it is not mandatory.
2nd it is more readable in one line.
- /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at
1/4 of ALP clock */
+ /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP
+ * clock
+ */
I agree with you when the comment would be longer.
- Sedat -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-28 9:12 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2014-12-28 14:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 15:01 ` Arend van Spriel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2014-12-28 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sedat Dilek
Cc: Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 28 December 2014 at 10:12, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 December 2014 at 06:50, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>>>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> As for the comment-line changes... 80+ chars are allowed for better readability.
>>> So, please don't do that.
>>> [ Checkpatch should not warn on this especially for comments. ]
>>
>> We almost always split long comments into separated lines in the
>> kernel. What's different with this case?
>>
>
> 1st it is not mandatory.
>
> 2nd it is more readable in one line.
>
> - /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at
> 1/4 of ALP clock */
> + /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP
> + * clock
> + */
>
> I agree with you when the comment would be longer.
So I guess there is some rule like
"Don't use 2 lines if there is 80 chars + one word"
? Where can I find such rules?
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-28 14:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2014-12-28 15:01 ` Arend van Spriel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2014-12-28 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Sedat Dilek, Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 12/28/14 15:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 28 December 2014 at 10:12, Sedat Dilek<sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Rafał Miłecki<zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 28 December 2014 at 06:50, Sedat Dilek<sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Rafał Miłecki<zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>>>>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez<oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki<zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for the comment-line changes... 80+ chars are allowed for better readability.
>>>> So, please don't do that.
>>>> [ Checkpatch should not warn on this especially for comments. ]
>>>
>>> We almost always split long comments into separated lines in the
>>> kernel. What's different with this case?
>>>
>>
>> 1st it is not mandatory.
>>
>> 2nd it is more readable in one line.
>>
>> - /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at
>> 1/4 of ALP clock */
>> + /* 4706 CC and PMU watchdogs are clocked at 1/4 of ALP
>> + * clock
>> + */
>>
>> I agree with you when the comment would be longer.
>
> So I guess there is some rule like
> "Don't use 2 lines if there is 80 chars + one word"
> ? Where can I find such rules?
Personally, I don't like taking this sliding slope. Just stick to the 80
characters rule and add a few words in the comment, eg:
/* The BCM4706 ChipCommon and PMU watchdogs are
* clocked at one quarter of the ALP clock.
*/
Regards,
Arend
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 5:50 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2014-12-29 7:16 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-07 11:18 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2014-12-29 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Oscar Forner Martinez, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes:
> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>
> Kalle: will you pick this patch?
Most likely yes, but let's wait first for John's opinion about how to
handle bcma patches.
--
Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-29 7:16 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2015-01-07 11:18 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
2015-01-07 13:57 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Òscar Forner Martínez @ 2015-01-07 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo
Cc: Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
That e-mail is just to remind that this patch stills waiting.
On 29 Dec 2014, at 07:16, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 27 December 2014 at 20:24, Oscar Forner Martinez
>> <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>
>> Kalle: will you pick this patch?
>
> Most likely yes, but let's wait first for John's opinion about how to
> handle bcma patches.
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2015-01-07 11:18 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
@ 2015-01-07 13:57 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-07 14:01 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2015-01-07 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Òscar Forner Martínez
Cc: Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Òscar Forner Martínez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> writes:
> That e-mail is just to remind that this patch stills waiting.
Just like the other 150 patches as of yesterday. All I can say please wait
patiently and follow the status in patchwork. Your patch isn't urgent in
any way.
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 07:16, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Kalle: will you pick this patch?
>>
>> Most likely yes, but let's wait first for John's opinion about how to
>> handle bcma patches.
I talked with John about this and I'll start taking bcma patches from
now on.
--
Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2015-01-07 13:57 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2015-01-07 14:01 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Òscar Forner Martínez @ 2015-01-07 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo
Cc: Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List
I know my patch is not urgent at all. My e-mail was just to remind that stills there. I do not know how much time I have to wait until I should remind a patch.
On 7 Jan 2015, at 13:57, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Òscar Forner Martínez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> That e-mail is just to remind that this patch stills waiting.
>
> Just like the other 150 patches as of yesterday. All I can say please wait
> patiently and follow the status in patchwork. Your patch isn't urgent in
> any way.
>
>> On 29 Dec 2014, at 07:16, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Kalle: will you pick this patch?
>>>
>>> Most likely yes, but let's wait first for John's opinion about how to
>>> handle bcma patches.
>
> I talked with John about this and I'll start taking bcma patches from
> now on.
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line
2014-12-27 19:24 [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line Oscar Forner Martinez
2014-12-27 20:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2015-01-15 12:42 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2015-01-15 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oscar Forner Martinez; +Cc: zajec5, linux-wireless, linux-kernel
Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com> writes:
> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in
> several lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers-next.git.
Hopefully I took the correct version this time :)
--
Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-15 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-27 19:24 [PATCH] bcma: fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line Oscar Forner Martinez
2014-12-27 20:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CADZ0Xg++nexnzmuaOp+MHXBbODwSpoEYNcbDU=X9tNYbzh=W-w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CADZ0XgJ=LU3n55MxcHUMdX7uRcOm-m+=DFLGDi6PPkj+5=y1sg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-27 23:42 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-27 23:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 5:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-12-28 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 9:12 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-12-28 14:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-12-28 15:01 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-29 7:16 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-07 11:18 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
2015-01-07 13:57 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-07 14:01 ` Òscar Forner Martínez
2015-01-15 12:42 ` Kalle Valo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).