From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S965444AbbBDWBz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:01:55 -0500
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:52412 "EHLO
	mail-lb0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933222AbbBDWBx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:01:53 -0500
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Remove ancient __FUNCTION__ hack
Organization: D03
References: <1423043318-29910-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
	<1423076787.16386.9.camel@perches.com>
	<87egq5wg5y.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
	<1423083786.16386.13.camel@perches.com>
X-Hashcash: 1:20:150204:joe@perches.com::a10wW9x6PMOIMBWf:002kll
X-Hashcash: 1:20:150204:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::AFx8wd4K/UusEQlY:0000000000000000000000000000000002V2h
X-Hashcash: 1:20:150204:mina86@mina86.com::TCvRGhmpTf2XO5TV:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005M9I
X-Hashcash: 1:20:150204:akpm@linux-foundation.org::5xDTc7ILBDiLPTNJ:0000000000000000000000000000000000006MnB
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:01:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1423083786.16386.13.camel@perches.com> (Joe Perches's message of
	"Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:03:06 -0800")
Message-ID: <87a90twd2w.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 04 2015, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 21:55 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 04 2015, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:48 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> >> __FUNCTION__ hasn't been treated as a string literal since gcc 3.4, so
>> >> this only helps people who only test-compile using 3.3
>> >> (compiler-gcc3.h barks at anything older than that). Besides, there
>> >> are almost no occurrences of __FUNCTION__ left in the tree.
>> >
>> > The remaining  uses of __FUNCTION__ need converting first.
>> 
>> Why? __FUNCTION__ is recognized just fine by gcc as an alias for __func__.
>
> And icc and clang and ...?

clang yes, icc probably (from quick googling).