From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964944AbXBLOcB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:32:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964942AbXBLOcA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:32:00 -0500 Received: from [217.111.56.2] ([217.111.56.2]:22671 "EHLO semtex.sncag.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964946AbXBLOcA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:32:00 -0500 To: Greg KH Cc: Rainer Weikusat , LKML , Oleg Verych , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19) In-Reply-To: <20070204043935.GA8829@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:39:36 -0800") References: <877ivb2kvc.fsf@semtex.sncag.com> <20070125185101.GA26279@kroah.com> <87y7nq131x.fsf@semtex.sncag.com> <20070126174828.GA28890@kroah.com> <87d54z1dhb.fsf@semtex.sncag.com> <20070129234340.GA6881@kroah.com> <87k5z4za4l.fsf@semtex.sncag.com> <20070204043935.GA8829@kroah.com> From: Rainer Weikusat Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:30:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87abzj5tz5.fsf@semtex.sncag.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH writes: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:40:10PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> Greg KH writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > Rainer's problem is a real bug in the USB driver code, which we need to >> > work on getting fixed, > > Ok, here's an updated version, that should tell us where things are > going wrong (if they are.) > > Can you try this out with debugging enabled for the driver: > modprobe keyspan debug=1 > > and let me know what the output of the kernel log is when you plug your > device in? I can do all sorts of things, but frankly, I just need my device to work (which it does again, courtesy of myself). Apart from that, this is still just what a SCO-person would call 'a structural copy' of my code with no functional changes, especially none that could result in any additional output. I believe it will work as well. Mine does, so I am not going to test a different one for the sake of having done so. If you want to fix it only if you can claim to have written the code, fine. If you'll never fix it --- fine as well. In either case, I have already put more time into this as I have available.