From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FC2C4338F for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00DD611ED for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231875AbhHUNfQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:35:16 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:48871 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229769AbhHUNfP (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:35:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1629552876; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=95lCQMtRZ3oSzWOdDjJ1909AnLQq/yrMzjCJjr9CGRU=; b=Yg7OByshnFauuZAgCSPCnFGryKa785VxNcV5j8ldZpJCUbvkwzLdCsK/1/fFdgLgHHv2tNSy zzaI2myxGtFY2CIluC4bn81alSqlxd2nn+sGIKKwGrndZwa99dUlT12tBEULYQSmfpT8UPzR rSswfrnCf6qzpdWq/5AVo0nI/Eg= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 612100e70f9b337f11ccf686 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:34:31 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E4E9AC43617; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tykki (tynnyri.adurom.net [51.15.11.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EEBBC4338F; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:34:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 7EEBBC4338F Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: Justin Forbes , Luca Coelho , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Matti Gottlieb , ybaruch , Johannes Berg , Ihab Zhaika , Emmanuel Grumbach , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "open list\:BPF \(Safe dynamic programs and tools\)" , LKML , yj99.shin@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi Add support for ax201 in Samsung Galaxy Book Flex2 Alpha References: <20210702223155.1981510-1-jforbes@fedoraproject.org> <8c55c7c9-a5ae-3b0e-8a0f-8954a8da7e7b@samsung.com> <94edb3c4-43a6-1031-8431-2befb0eca2bf@samsung.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:34:23 +0300 In-Reply-To: <94edb3c4-43a6-1031-8431-2befb0eca2bf@samsung.com> (Jaehoon Chung's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:26:06 +0900") Message-ID: <87ilzyudk0.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jaehoon Chung writes: > Hi > > On 8/9/21 8:09 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> Hi >> >> On 7/10/21 2:32 AM, Justin Forbes wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:32 PM Justin M. Forbes >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The Samsung Galaxy Book Flex2 Alpha uses an ax201 with the ID a0f0/6074. >>>> This works fine with the existing driver once it knows to claim it. >>>> Simple patch to add the device. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes > > If this patch is merged, can this patch be also applied on stable tree? Luca, what should we do with this patch? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches