LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>, Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nicolas Saenz <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] cpuset: Add cpuset.isolation_mask file
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:44:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8b4mpfb.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714231338.GA65963@lothringen>
On 15/07/21 01:13, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> cpusets already has means to create paritions; why are you creating
>> something else?
>
> I was about to answer that the semantics of isolcpus, which reference
> a NULL domain, are different from SD_LOAD_BALANCE implied by
> cpuset.sched_load_balance. But then I realize that SD_LOAD_BALANCE has
> been removed.
>
> How cpuset.sched_load_balance is implemented then? Commit
> e669ac8ab952df2f07dee1e1efbf40647d6de332 ("sched: Remove checks against
> SD_LOAD_BALANCE") advertize that setting cpuset.sched_load_balance to 0
> ends up creating NULL domain but that's not what I get. For example if I
> mount a single cpuset root (no other cpuset mountpoints):
>
> $ mount -t cgroup none ./cpuset -o cpuset
> $ cd cpuset
> $ cat cpuset.cpus
> 0-7
> $ cat cpuset.sched_load_balance
> 1
> $ echo 0 > cpuset.sched_load_balance
> $ ls /sys/kernel/debug/domains/cpu1/
> domain0 domain1
>
> I still get the domains on all CPUs...
Huh. That's on v5.14-rc1 with an automounted cpuset:
$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.cpus
0-5
$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance
1
$ ls /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu*
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu0:
domain0 domain1
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu1:
domain0 domain1
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu2:
domain0 domain1
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu3:
domain0 domain1
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu4:
domain0 domain1
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu5:
domain0 domain1
$ echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance
$ ls /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu*
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu0:
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu1:
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu2:
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu3:
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu4:
/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu5:
I also checked that you can keep cpuset.sched_load_balance=0 at the root
and create exclusive child cpusets with different values of
sched_load_balance, giving you some CPUs attached to the NULL domain and
some others with a sched_domain hierarchy that stays within the cpuset span.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 13:54 [RFC PATCH 0/6] cpuset: Allow to modify isolcpus through cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] pci: Decouple HK_FLAG_WQ and HK_FLAG_DOMAIN cpumask fetch Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] workqueue: " Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] net: " Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] sched/isolation: Split domain housekeeping mask from the rest Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Make HK_FLAG_DOMAIN mutable Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-21 14:28 ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-07-14 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] cpuset: Add cpuset.isolation_mask file Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 16:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-19 13:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-19 15:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-07-14 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 23:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-14 23:44 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-07-15 0:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-15 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-19 13:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-16 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] cpuset: Allow to modify isolcpus through cpuset Waiman Long
2021-07-19 13:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8b4mpfb.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=abelits@marvell.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] cpuset: Add cpuset.isolation_mask file' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).