LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/39] KVM: x86/xen: support upcall vector
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:08:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8875ff08-9b92-3eb7-3b17-f5dc036148e2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <052867ae1c997487d85c21e995feb5647ac6c458.camel@infradead.org>

On 2020-12-02 11:02 a.m., David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 18:34 +0000, Joao Martins wrote:
>> On 12/2/20 4:47 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 13:12 +0000, Joao Martins wrote:
>>>> On 12/2/20 11:17 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>>>> I might be more inclined to go for a model where the kernel handles the
>>>>> evtchn_pending/evtchn_mask for us. What would go into the irq routing
>>>>> table is { vcpu, port# } which get passed to kvm_xen_evtchn_send().
>>>>
>>>> But passing port to the routing and handling the sending of events wouldn't it lead to
>>>> unnecessary handling of event channels which aren't handled by the kernel, compared to
>>>> just injecting caring about the upcall?
>>>
>>> Well, I'm generally in favour of *not* doing things in the kernel that
>>> don't need to be there.
>>>
>>> But if the kernel is going to short-circuit the IPIs and VIRQs, then
>>> it's already going to have to handle the evtchn_pending/evtchn_mask
>>> bitmaps, and actually injecting interrupts.
>>>
>>
>> Right. I was trying to point that out in the discussion we had
>> in next patch. But true be told, more about touting the idea of kernel
>> knowing if a given event channel is registered for userspace handling,
>> rather than fully handling the event channel.
>>
>> I suppose we are able to provide both options to the VMM anyway
>> i.e. 1) letting them handle it enterily in userspace by intercepting
>> EVTCHNOP_send, or through the irq route if we want kernel to offload it.
> 
> Right. The kernel takes what it knows about and anything else goes up
> to userspace.
> 
> I do like the way you've handled the vcpu binding in userspace, and the
> kernel just knows that a given port goes to a given target CPU.
> 
>>
>>> For the VMM
>>> API I think we should follow the Xen model, mixing the domain-wide and
>>> per-vCPU configuration. It's the best way to faithfully model the
>>> behaviour a true Xen guest would experience.
>>>
>>> So KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_CALLBACK_VIA can be used to set one of
>>>   • HVMIRQ_callback_vector, taking a vector#
>>>   • HVMIRQ_callback_gsi for the in-kernel irqchip, taking a GSI#
>>>
>>> And *maybe* in a later patch it could also handle
>>>   • HVMIRQ_callback_gsi for split-irqchip, taking an eventfd
>>>   • HVMIRQ_callback_pci_intx, taking an eventfd (or a pair, for EOI?)
>>>
>>
>> Most of the Xen versions we were caring had callback_vector and
>> vcpu callback vector (despite Linux not using the latter). But if you're
>> dating back to 3.2 and 4.1 well (or certain Windows drivers), I suppose
>> gsi and pci-intx are must-haves.
> 
> Note sure about GSI but PCI-INTX is definitely something I've seen in
> active use by customers recently. I think SLES10 will use that.
> 
>> I feel we could just accommodate it as subtype in KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_CALLBACK_VIA.
>> Don't see the adavantage in having another xen attr type.
> 
> Yeah, fair enough.
> 
>> But kinda have mixed feelings in having kernel handling all event channels ABI,
>> as opposed to only the ones userspace asked to offload. It looks a tad unncessary besides
>> the added gain to VMMs that don't need to care about how the internals of event channels.
>> But performance-wise it wouldn't bring anything better. But maybe, the former is reason
>> enough to consider it.
> 
> Yeah, we'll see. Especially when it comes to implementing FIFO event
> channels, I'd rather just do it in one place — and if the kernel does
> it anyway then it's hardly difficult to hook into that.

Sorry I'm late to this conversation. Not a whole lot to add to what Joao
said. I would only differ with him on how much to offload.

Given that we need the fast path in the kernel anyway, I think it's simpler
to do all the event-channel bitmap only in the kernel.
This would also simplify using the kernel Xen drivers if someone eventually
decides to use them.


Ankur

> 
> But I've been about as coherent as I can be in email, and I think we're
> generally aligned on the direction. I'll do some more experiments and
> see what I can get working, and what it looks like.
> 
> I'm focusing on making the shinfo stuff all use kvm_map_gfn() first.
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-20 20:15 [PATCH RFC 00/39] x86/KVM: Xen HVM guest support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 01/39] KVM: x86: fix Xen hypercall page msr handling Joao Martins
2019-02-22  1:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-02-22 11:47     ` Joao Martins
2019-02-22 12:51     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 10:39       ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 11:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 11:27           ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 02/39] KVM: x86/xen: intercept xen hypercalls if enabled Joao Martins
2019-02-21 18:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-02-21 20:56     ` Joao Martins
2019-02-22  0:30       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-02-22 12:50         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-01  9:48   ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-01 11:19     ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 11:17       ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 12:12         ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02  5:19     ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-02  8:03       ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 18:20         ` Ankur Arora
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 03/39] KVM: x86/xen: register shared_info page Joao Martins
2020-12-01 13:07   ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02  0:40     ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-02  1:26       ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02  5:17         ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-02 10:50           ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 10:44       ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 12:20         ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 20:32           ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-03 10:16             ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-04 17:30               ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-02 20:33         ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-12 12:07       ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 04/39] KVM: x86/xen: setup pvclock updates Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 05/39] KVM: x86/xen: update wallclock region Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 06/39] KVM: x86/xen: register vcpu info Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 07/39] KVM: x86/xen: register vcpu time info region Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 08/39] KVM: x86/xen: register steal clock Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 09/39] KVM: x86: declare Xen HVM guest capability Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 10/39] KVM: x86/xen: support upcall vector Joao Martins
2020-12-02 11:17   ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 13:12     ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 16:47       ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 18:34         ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 19:02           ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-02 20:12             ` Joao Martins
2020-12-02 20:37               ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-03  1:08             ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2020-12-08 16:08             ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-09  6:35               ` Ankur Arora
2020-12-09 10:27                 ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-09 10:51                   ` Joao Martins
2020-12-09 11:39                     ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-09 13:26                       ` Joao Martins
2020-12-09 15:41                         ` David Woodhouse
2020-12-09 16:12                           ` Joao Martins
2021-01-01 14:33           ` David Woodhouse
2021-01-05 12:11             ` Joao Martins
2021-01-05 13:23               ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 11/39] KVM: x86/xen: evtchn signaling via eventfd Joao Martins
2020-11-30  9:41   ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 12:17     ` Joao Martins
2020-11-30 12:55       ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 15:08         ` Joao Martins
2020-11-30 16:48           ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 17:15             ` Joao Martins
2020-11-30 18:01               ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 18:41                 ` Joao Martins
2020-11-30 19:04                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-30 19:25                     ` Joao Martins
2021-11-23 13:15           ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 12/39] KVM: x86/xen: store virq when assigning evtchn Joao Martins
     [not found]   ` <b750291466f3c89e0a393e48079c087704b217a5.camel@amazon.co.uk>
2022-02-10 12:17     ` Joao Martins
2022-02-10 15:23       ` [EXTERNAL] " David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 13/39] KVM: x86/xen: handle PV timers oneshot mode Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 14/39] KVM: x86/xen: handle PV IPI vcpu yield Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 15/39] KVM: x86/xen: handle PV spinlocks slowpath Joao Martins
2022-02-08 12:36   ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-10 12:17     ` Joao Martins
2022-02-10 14:11       ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 16/39] KVM: x86: declare Xen HVM evtchn offload capability Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 17/39] x86/xen: export vcpu_info and shared_info Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 18/39] x86/xen: make hypercall_page generic Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 19/39] xen/xenbus: xenbus uninit support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 20/39] xen-blkback: module_exit support Joao Martins
2019-02-25 18:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-02-26 11:20     ` Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 21/39] KVM: x86/xen: domid allocation Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 22/39] KVM: x86/xen: grant table init Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 23/39] KVM: x86/xen: grant table grow support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 24/39] KVM: x86/xen: backend hypercall support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 25/39] KVM: x86/xen: grant map support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 26/39] KVM: x86/xen: grant unmap support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 27/39] KVM: x86/xen: grant copy support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 28/39] KVM: x86/xen: interdomain evtchn support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC 29/39] KVM: x86/xen: evtchn unmask support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 30/39] KVM: x86/xen: add additional evtchn ops Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 31/39] xen-shim: introduce shim domain driver Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 32/39] xen/balloon: xen_shim_domain() support Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 33/39] xen/grant-table: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 34/39] xen/gntdev: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 35/39] xen/xenbus: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 36/39] drivers/xen: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 37/39] xen-netback: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 38/39] xen-blkback: " Joao Martins
2019-02-20 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC 39/39] KVM: x86: declare Xen HVM Dom0 capability Joao Martins
2019-02-20 21:09 ` [PATCH RFC 00/39] x86/KVM: Xen HVM guest support Paolo Bonzini
2019-02-21  0:29   ` Ankur Arora
2019-02-21 11:45   ` Joao Martins
2019-02-22 16:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-12 17:14       ` Joao Martins
2019-04-08  6:44         ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-08 10:36           ` Joao Martins
2019-04-08 10:42             ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-08 17:31               ` Joao Martins
2019-04-09  0:35                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-10  5:50                   ` [Xen-devel] " Ankur Arora
2019-04-10 20:45                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-09  5:04                 ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-10  6:55                   ` Ankur Arora
2019-04-10  7:14                     ` Juergen Gross
2019-02-20 23:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-02-21  0:31   ` Ankur Arora
2019-02-21  7:57   ` Juergen Gross
2019-02-21 12:00     ` Joao Martins
2019-02-21 11:55   ` Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8875ff08-9b92-3eb7-3b17-f5dc036148e2@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH RFC 10/39] KVM: x86/xen: support upcall vector' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).