LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Getting empty callchain from perf_callchain_kernel()
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 18:40:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8C814E68-B0B6-47E4-BDD6-917B01EC62D0@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517091044.GM2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
+Alexei, Daniel, and bpf
> On May 17, 2019, at 2:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:15:39PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
>> Hi, I think the actual problem is that bpf_get_stackid_tp (and maybe
>> some other bfp functions) is now broken, or, strating an unwind
>> directly inside a bpf program will end up strangely. It have following
>> kernel message:
>
> Urgh, what is that bpf_get_stackid_tp() doing to get the regs? I can't
> follow.
I guess we need something like the following? (we should be able to
optimize the PER_CPU stuff).
Thanks,
Song
diff --git i/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c w/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index f92d6ad5e080..c525149028a7 100644
--- i/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ w/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -696,11 +696,13 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto_tp = {
.arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, bpf_stackid_tp_regs);
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_tp, void *, tp_buff, struct bpf_map *, map,
u64, flags)
{
- struct pt_regs *regs = *(struct pt_regs **)tp_buff;
+ struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_stackid_tp_regs);
+ perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
/*
* Same comment as in bpf_perf_event_output_tp(), only that this time
* the other helper's function body cannot be inlined due to being
@@ -719,10 +721,13 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto_tp = {
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, bpf_stack_tp_regs);
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_tp, void *, tp_buff, void *, buf, u32, size,
u64, flags)
{
- struct pt_regs *regs = *(struct pt_regs **)tp_buff;
+ struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_stack_tp_regs);
+
+ perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
return bpf_get_stack((unsigned long) regs, (unsigned long) buf,
(unsigned long) size, flags, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-17 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 23:51 Song Liu
2019-05-17 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 8:15 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-17 8:32 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-17 16:22 ` Song Liu
2019-05-17 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-17 18:40 ` Song Liu [this message]
2019-05-17 21:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-17 21:48 ` Song Liu
2019-05-19 18:07 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-20 17:22 ` Song Liu
2019-05-22 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-19 18:06 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-20 17:16 ` Song Liu
2019-05-20 17:19 ` Song Liu
2019-05-22 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-22 14:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-22 17:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 23:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 6:48 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 8:27 ` Song Liu
2019-05-23 9:11 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 13:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 14:50 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 15:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-23 16:41 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-23 17:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-24 2:20 ` Kairui Song
2019-05-24 23:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-27 11:57 ` Kairui Song
2019-06-06 16:04 ` Song Liu
2019-06-06 23:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-11 21:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-24 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 13:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 3:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-12 14:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-12 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-12 14:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 18:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-22 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-05-17 16:32 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8C814E68-B0B6-47E4-BDD6-917B01EC62D0@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--subject='Re: Getting empty callchain from perf_callchain_kernel()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).