LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <>
To: Sam Ravnborg <>
Cc: Roman Zippel <>,
	Linux Kernel list <>
Subject: Re: kbuild question
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:22:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Feb 18, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

>>> Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you  
>>> can only
>>> select a single board to build for.  For a lot of people this is  
>>> sufficient,
>>> however we are moving towards a world where you can easily build  
>>> in support
>>> for multiple boards into a single kernel.
>>> I'd like to have it such that if I'm only building support for  
>>> one board
>>> (CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE, not going to call it that, but for this  
>>> discussion its
>>> sufficient), you get a choice menu from Kconfig enforcing the  
>>> ability to only
>>> select one board.  However if !CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE than you can  
>>> select
>>> multiple boards to build into your kernel.
>>> if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set we can optimize out the runtime  
>>> checks that get
>>> added for handling the multiple board case.
>> On m68k we have the same problem, but what I'm what I'm  
>> considering is to
>> add a new mode for choice groups - at least one must be selected and
>> kconfig generates the extra information if only one is selected.
> How about extendign the current 'option' syntax to do this?
> So we could do something like:
> choice
> 	prompt "choice prompt"
> 	default VAL_FIRST
> 	option multivalue if !CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE
> config VAL_FIRST
> 	bool "first"
> config VAL_SECOND
> 	bool "second"
> endchoice
> It seems to fit well with how option is used today, and extends  
> current
> syntax nicely.

This works for me, however I dont have the first clue about hacking  
on kconfig code.

I'm happy to test out a patch if one of you guys wouldn't mind  
working something up.. or point me and what I should look at to do this.

- k

      reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-15 19:18 Kumar Gala
2007-02-15 22:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-15 23:44   ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-16  8:50     ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-16 10:23 ` Roman Zippel
2007-02-16 14:14   ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-18 17:16     ` Roman Zippel
2007-02-18 19:25       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-03-15 15:22         ` Kumar Gala [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: kbuild question' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).