LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: About resctrl code rebase
@ 2021-09-01 8:35 tan.shaopeng
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-01 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'james.morse@arm.com'
Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
misono.tomohiro
Hi, James Morse
> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
> control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> And where is the rebase code?
> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: About resctrl code rebase
2021-09-01 8:35 About resctrl code rebase tan.shaopeng
@ 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tan.shaopeng
Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
misono.tomohiro
Hi Tan Shaopeng,
On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
>> control function into resctrl.
>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/
and there are a couple more after that.
>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
>> And where is the rebase code?
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)
I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.
> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!
Thanks,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: About resctrl code rebase
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
@ 2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'James Morse'
Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
misono.tomohiro
Hi, James Morse
Thanks for your reply.
> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
>
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
>
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
>
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
>
> and there are a couple more after that.
I understand.
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
>
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)
I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86.
Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng
> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
>
>
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
>
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: About resctrl code rebase
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
@ 2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-11-24 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'James Morse'
Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
misono.tomohiro
Hi James
> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
>
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
>
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
>
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
>
> and there are a couple more after that.
When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
>
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)
>
> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
Is there anything I can do for you?
Best regards,
Tan shaopeng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-24 11:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-01 8:35 About resctrl code rebase tan.shaopeng
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).